Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Argo

632
442
+ 1
6
Harbor

170
183
+ 1
11
Add tool

Argo vs Harbor: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Argo and Harbor, two popular container registry solutions.

  1. Scalability: Argo is designed to handle large-scale container deployments and provides efficient resource utilization with its cluster-wide deployment capabilities. On the other hand, Harbor is better suited for smaller deployments but still offers scalability options with multiple registry replicas and proxy caching.

  2. Security: Argo provides robust security features, including fine-grained access control and user authentication using OpenID Connect. It also supports encryption of sensitive data at rest and in transit. Harbor, on the other hand, offers similar security features, allowing organizations to authenticate users, enforce role-based access control, and scan for vulnerabilities within container images.

  3. Multi-tenancy: Argo is built with multi-tenancy in mind, allowing multiple teams or organizations to share a single deployment cluster while maintaining isolation between their respective resources. It provides namespace and RBAC capabilities to manage access and permissions. Harbor, on the other hand, lacks native multi-tenancy support, making it more suitable for single-tenant use cases.

  4. User Interface and Management: Argo provides a comprehensive web-based user interface that allows users to deploy, manage, and monitor applications in a visual manner. It also offers a command-line interface for more advanced operations. Harbor, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly web UI to manage container images, and it integrates with popular container orchestration platforms for streamlined management.

  5. Integration and Compatibility: Argo is tightly integrated with Kubernetes and leverages its native capabilities for container orchestration. It can be seamlessly integrated into existing Kubernetes deployments without requiring any additional infrastructure. Harbor, on the other hand, is compatible with various container runtimes and is not limited to Kubernetes. It can be used with other container orchestration tools like Docker Swarm or OpenShift.

  6. Extensibility: Argo provides an extensible platform with a range of capabilities, including the ability to define custom workflows, integrate with external systems, and create custom plugins for automation. Harbor, on the other hand, is more focused on container image management and may have limited extensibility options compared to Argo.

In summary, Argo and Harbor are both powerful container registry solutions, but they differ in terms of scalability, security, multi-tenancy support, user interface, integration, and extensibility. The choice between them depends on specific deployment requirements and the need for advanced features in each area.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Argo
Pros of Harbor
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 2
    Autosinchronize the changes to deploy
  • 1
    Online service, no need to install anything
  • 4
    Good on-premises container registry
  • 1
    Container Replication
  • 1
    Nice UI
  • 1
    Vulnerability Scanner
  • 1
    Supports LDAP/Active Directory
  • 1
    Supports OIDC
  • 1
    Support multiple authentication methods
  • 1
    Perfect for Teams and Organizations

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Argo?

Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).

What is Harbor?

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Argo?
What companies use Harbor?
See which teams inside your own company are using Argo or Harbor.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Argo?
What tools integrate with Harbor?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

PythonDockerKubernetes+14
12
2615
What are some alternatives to Argo and Harbor?
Airflow
Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
Flux
Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Spinnaker
Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.
Kubeflow
The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.
See all alternatives