Argo vs Helios: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When comparing Argo and Helios, it is crucial to understand the key differences between these two container management platforms.

1. **Architecture**: Argo utilizes a declarative workflow specification format, allowing users to define complex pipelines using YAML files, while Helios follows a simpler approach by utilizing a command-line interface for container management tasks.
2. **Support for Kubernetes**: Argo is specifically designed to integrate seamlessly with Kubernetes, providing features like CRD (Custom Resource Definition) controllers, which Helios lacks. This makes Argo more suitable for Kubernetes-centric environments.
3. **Workflow Management**: Argo offers a dedicated workflow controller that enables users to define, execute, and monitor complex workflows, while Helios focuses primarily on container lifecycle management, lacking dedicated workflow management capabilities.
4. **Community Support**: Argo benefits from a larger and more active open-source community, leading to frequent updates, bug fixes, and new features, whereas Helios may have a smaller community, resulting in slower development cycles.
5. **User Interface**: Argo provides a user-friendly and intuitive web-based UI for managing workflows and pipelines, offering a more visually appealing and interactive experience for users compared to Helios, which relies on CLI for most interactions.

In Summary, Argo and Helios differ significantly in terms of architecture, Kubernetes support, workflow management, community support, and user interface, catering to different needs and preferences in the container management space.