StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Video Hosting
  4. Web And Video Conferencing
  5. Around vs WebRTC

Around vs WebRTC

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WebRTC
WebRTC
Stacks322
Followers538
Votes6
Around
Around
Stacks15
Followers16
Votes0

Around vs WebRTC: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Around and WebRTC technologies. Both Around and WebRTC are used for enabling real-time communication on websites and applications. However, there are several distinct differences between the two. Let's explore them below.

  1. Workflow and architecture: Around is a cloud-based video calling platform that provides a simple API for developers to integrate video calling into their applications. It handles the entire video calling workflow, including signaling, media control, and peer-to-peer connections. On the other hand, WebRTC is a free and open-source project that provides a standardized framework for real-time communication using web browsers and mobile applications. It includes a set of API methods and protocols for establishing peer-to-peer connections, but developers need to build the application logic themselves.

  2. Browser support: One of the significant differences between Around and WebRTC is browser support. Around is designed to work across different devices and web browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. It abstracts the complexity of browser compatibility, ensuring a consistent experience for users. In contrast, WebRTC has broader browser support but may require additional work to handle browser-specific quirks, especially in older versions or less common browsers.

  3. Features and functionalities: Around provides a comprehensive set of features and functionalities out of the box, such as screen sharing, recording, chat, and real-time transcription. These additional features make it suitable for various use cases, including remote collaboration and customer support. WebRTC, on the other hand, provides the basic building blocks for real-time communication, such as audio and video streaming, peer-to-peer data transfer, and device control. Developers need to implement additional features themselves or rely on third-party libraries or services.

  4. Reliability and quality: Around offers enterprise-grade reliability and quality for video calling, thanks to its cloud infrastructure and advanced optimizations. It ensures low-latency, high-quality audio and video streaming, even in challenging network conditions. WebRTC, being a peer-to-peer technology, heavily relies on the network conditions between the peers. The quality of the communication can vary depending on factors like network bandwidth, latency, and available computing resources on the devices.

  5. Security and privacy: Around prioritizes security and privacy by providing end-to-end encryption for video calls, ensuring that communication remains confidential and secure. It also adheres to industry-standard security practices and compliances. WebRTC, by default, supports secure communication using Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS). However, the specific security implementation depends on the application and how the WebRTC technology is used.

  6. Ease of implementation: As mentioned earlier, Around abstracts the complexity of video calling and provides a straightforward API, making it easier for developers to implement video communication features in their applications. It handles tasks like signaling, media control, and fallback mechanisms, enabling developers to focus on their core application logic. WebRTC, while powerful, requires developers to handle low-level details like signaling, ICE negotiation, codec selection, and NAT traversal, which can be more complex and time-consuming.

In summary, Around offers a cloud-based video calling platform with comprehensive features and simplified implementation, while WebRTC provides a standardized framework for real-time communication but requires developers to handle lower-level details and build the application logic themselves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WebRTC, Around

Ritwik
Ritwik

May 27, 2020

Needs adviceonWebRTCWebRTCAmazon ChimeAmazon ChimeAgoraAgora

Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

463k views463k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WebRTC
WebRTC
Around
Around

It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

Quick, next-gen video calls. It combines inventions in audio technology & a fresh perspective on video UI. Introducing major inventions in signal processing, AI-based background noise filtering, voice proximity detection, and UX.

-
AI-based camera framing; AI-based auto-mute; New meeting dynamics; Unique audio technology; No team setup required; Designed for maximum privacy
Statistics
Stacks
322
Stacks
15
Followers
538
Followers
16
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    OpenSource
  • 2
    No Download
  • 1
    You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Slack
Slack
Linux
Linux
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to WebRTC, Around?

Discord

Discord

Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover.

Skype

Skype

Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.

Zoom

Zoom

Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.

Google Meet

Google Meet

It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

Jitsi

Jitsi

Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting.

Webex

Webex

Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together.

Viber

Viber

It is a cross-platform instant messaging and voice over IP application provided as freeware for the Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS platforms.

Jami

Jami

It is a free software for universal communication which respects freedoms and privacy of its users. Its main goal is to provide a communication framework and end-user applications to make audio or video calls, send text messages and make generic data transfers. It makes this possible via multiple paradigms: a modern decentralized approach using a DHT to find peers or classical centralized SIP as a soft-phone.

TeamViewer

TeamViewer

Its aproprietary software for remote control, desktop sharing, online meetings, web conferencing and file transfer between computers.

Hangouts

Hangouts

It is a communication platform which includes messaging, video chat, and VOIP features.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack