StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ASP.NET Core vs ASP.NET Zero

ASP.NET Core vs ASP.NET Zero

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
Stacks11.0K
Followers2.7K
Votes1.6K
ASP.NET Zero
ASP.NET Zero
Stacks28
Followers77
Votes41

ASP.NET Core vs ASP.NET Zero: What are the differences?

Introduction

ASP.NET Core and ASP.NET Zero are both popular frameworks used for building web applications. While ASP.NET Core is a framework for building modern, cloud-based applications, ASP.NET Zero is a ready-made application framework that follows best practices and aims to accelerate the development process. Despite some similarities, there are several key differences between ASP.NET Core and ASP.NET Zero.

1. Separation of Concerns:

ASP.NET Core focuses on the separation of concerns by implementing the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It allows developers to separate the application logic, data, and presentation layers, enabling easier maintenance, testing, and flexibility for different device types. On the other hand, ASP.NET Zero adopts a modular architecture that follows Domain Driven Design (DDD) principles. It provides a clear separation between the application's modules, which simplifies development, scalability, and maintainability.

2. Authentication and Authorization:

ASP.NET Core offers a flexible authentication and authorization system that supports various authentication providers, such as external logins, social logins, and token-based authentication. It enables fine-grained access control based on user roles and policy-based authorization. ASP.NET Zero, on the other hand, includes a built-in identity and permission management system that simplifies user management, authentication, and authorization. It provides ready-made screens and features for user registration, login, and role-based permissions.

3. Multi-Tenancy Support:

ASP.NET Core provides multi-tenancy support out of the box, allowing developers to build applications that serve multiple customers or tenants from a single codebase. It enables easy management of tenant-specific data, configuration, and customization. ASP.NET Zero takes multi-tenancy to the next level by providing a complete multi-tenant architecture with separate databases, schemas, and user interfaces per tenant. It offers tenant management screens and features, making it easier to build and manage multi-tenant applications.

4. UI Frameworks and Theming:

ASP.NET Core does not enforce any specific UI frameworks or theming options. It allows developers to choose from a wide range of frontend technologies, such as Angular, React, or Blazor, and customize the user interface according to their needs. ASP.NET Zero, on the other hand, comes with a built-in UI framework based on popular frontend technologies like Angular or React. It provides ready-to-use screens, components, and theming options that speed up the development process.

5. Extensibility and Customization:

ASP.NET Core promotes extensibility by providing a modular and pluggable architecture. Developers can easily extend the framework's functionality by adding custom middleware, services, or libraries. ASP.NET Zero, on the other hand, offers a customizable framework that allows developers to modify or extend its features and behavior. It provides hooks, events, and extension points that enable developers to add custom business logic, UI components, or integrations without modifying the core framework.

6. Pricing and Licensing:

ASP.NET Core is an open-source framework and is available for free under the MIT license. It allows developers to use, modify, and distribute the framework without any licensing restrictions. ASP.NET Zero, on the other hand, is a commercial framework and requires a license for commercial usage. It provides different licensing options based on the number of developers and projects, and it offers additional support and updates.

In summary, ASP.NET Core focuses on separation of concerns, provides flexible authentication and multi-tenancy support, allows freedom in UI frameworks and theming, and promotes extensibility. On the other hand, ASP.NET Zero is a ready-made application framework with a modular architecture, built-in identity and permission management, complete multi-tenant support, a built-in UI framework with theming options, and offers customization options with commercial licensing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ASP.NET Core, ASP.NET Zero

Arman
Arman

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonReactReact

As a medium level .Net programmer trying to implementing a website, I decided to go through the Asp.Net Core. I found some tutorials on the web and started learning; however, I faced a problem. Even though I have been working with .Net and C# (mostly with unity game engine, which led to a quite amazing mobile game, published on a Persian app store) for two years or even more, by start learning Asp.Net Core, I found out that I do not know .Net as much as I expected. There were some things I should have learned before.

I searched for other frameworks, and Django was a popular one. Besides, I have planned to learn Python for machine learning. The website I want to make (with a small team) is nearly similar to Khan Academy. (We are going to use React for front-end)

So, What should I do? Continue working on .Net core with its amazing new features, or start getting into the Python and Django?

Your advice accompanied by reasons will be greatly appreciated!

424k views424k
Comments
Korawich
Korawich

Apr 7, 2020

Needs advice

I have a mission to make a web application for my organization (engineering consultant). With the following bullet points that the new web app has to cover, what is the right tool?

  1. It should be able to display employee data and project data. For example, when searching the name of Mr. Peter Parker, I should be able to click on the name to see his personal profile and also a list of construction projects he is or was a part of. Also, if I click on a project name, say Project ABC building, it should show me the detail of this project (who is the client, who works on this project, where, start-finish dates, etc.)

  2. It should be able to sync with the database from Microsoft Access.

(optional) 3. The user of this web app should be able to propose a rotation of role (Ex. Boss might want Mr. Peter Paker to work in another project next month, he can just drag Peter into XYZ Building.)

296k views296k
Comments
Taimoor
Taimoor

Associate Software Engineer at Intech Process Automation

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReactPythonPython

For context, I currently use JavaScript (React) and Python (Flask) in my daily routine.

I need your help in choosing either Spring Boot or ASP.NET Core. Both frameworks seem to have mature ecosystems. I would like to hear your thoughts on the following points:

  • Difficulty level of both frameworks
  • Level of community support
  • Career prospects i.e do Spring based jobs pay more or vice versa
  • which one will be helpful if I decide to transition towards a more specialized field like data engineering.

I am asking this because it is something that I am also exploring in parallel. I know that Python and #SQL play a huge role in big data.

794k views794k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Zero
ASP.NET Zero

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ASP.NET Zero is a starting point for new web applications with modern UI and SOLID architecture. It saves time by providing common application requirements with pre-built modules/pages as a Visual Studio solution (with full source code).

-
Multi-Tenancy; Authentication & Authorization; Rapid Application Development; Http Api; Mobile Application; Setting Management; Solid Architecture; Based On Strong Frameworks; Based On Metronic Theme; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Automated Testing
Statistics
Stacks
11.0K
Stacks
28
Followers
2.7K
Followers
77
Votes
1.6K
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 143
    C#
  • 118
    Performance
  • 96
    Open source
  • 90
    NuGet
  • 84
    Easy to learn and use
Cons
  • 5
    Great Doc
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Clean
  • 2
    Professionally written Nuget Packages, vs IMPORT junk
  • 1
    Long polling is difficult to implement
Pros
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Starting point for web applications
  • 4
    Clean & SOLID architecture
  • 3
    Core features covering most business needs
  • 3
    Pre-built functionalities
Integrations
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
macOS
macOS
NGINX
NGINX
.NET
.NET
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Windows
Windows
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
.NET Core
.NET Core
AngularJS
AngularJS
jQuery
jQuery
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
npm
npm
SignalR
SignalR
Entity Framework
Entity Framework
NuGet
NuGet
Xamarin
Xamarin

What are some alternatives to ASP.NET Core, ASP.NET Zero?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase