StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ASP.NET Core vs JBoss Seam

ASP.NET Core vs JBoss Seam

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JBoss Seam
JBoss Seam
Stacks8
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars32
Forks51
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
Stacks11.0K
Followers2.7K
Votes1.6K

ASP.NET Core vs JBoss Seam: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ASP.NET Core and JBoss Seam

ASP.NET Core and JBoss Seam are both frameworks used for building web applications. However, they have several key differences.

  1. Architecture: ASP.NET Core follows a modular and lightweight architecture, allowing developers to choose the components they need, resulting in improved performance and flexibility. JBoss Seam, on the other hand, follows a monolithic architecture, where all components are tightly integrated, limiting the flexibility to choose specific features.

  2. Language Support: ASP.NET Core supports multiple programming languages, including C#, F#, and Visual Basic, providing developers with the flexibility to choose the language that best suits their needs. JBoss Seam is primarily focused on Java, which limits the language options for developers.

  3. Platform Independence: ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, meaning it can run on Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing developers with the freedom to choose their preferred operating system. JBoss Seam, on the other hand, is primarily designed to run on Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE) application servers, which limits its platform compatibility.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: ASP.NET Core has a larger community and ecosystem compared to JBoss Seam. This means there are more resources, documentation, and community support available for developers working with ASP.NET Core, making it easier to find solutions to problems and gain knowledge. JBoss Seam, on the other hand, has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may lead to limited resources and community support.

  5. Performance: ASP.NET Core is known for its high performance, thanks to its lightweight architecture and optimized runtime. It leverages modern technologies like Razor Pages and WebAssembly to deliver fast and responsive web applications. JBoss Seam, while still performing well, may not have the same level of performance optimizations as ASP.NET Core.

  6. Integration with Other Tools and Frameworks: ASP.NET Core is designed to integrate seamlessly with various tools and frameworks, such as Entity Framework Core for data access and Angular for frontend development. It provides a unified development experience by offering built-in support and tooling for these technologies. JBoss Seam, although it provides integration with other Java frameworks, may not have the same level of seamless integration with non-Java tools and frameworks.

In summary, ASP.NET Core and JBoss Seam differ in terms of architecture, language support, platform independence, community and ecosystem, performance, and integration with other tools and frameworks. These differences can impact the development experience and the capabilities of web applications built using these frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JBoss Seam, ASP.NET Core

Arman
Arman

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonReactReact

As a medium level .Net programmer trying to implementing a website, I decided to go through the Asp.Net Core. I found some tutorials on the web and started learning; however, I faced a problem. Even though I have been working with .Net and C# (mostly with unity game engine, which led to a quite amazing mobile game, published on a Persian app store) for two years or even more, by start learning Asp.Net Core, I found out that I do not know .Net as much as I expected. There were some things I should have learned before.

I searched for other frameworks, and Django was a popular one. Besides, I have planned to learn Python for machine learning. The website I want to make (with a small team) is nearly similar to Khan Academy. (We are going to use React for front-end)

So, What should I do? Continue working on .Net core with its amazing new features, or start getting into the Python and Django?

Your advice accompanied by reasons will be greatly appreciated!

424k views424k
Comments
Korawich
Korawich

Apr 7, 2020

Needs advice

I have a mission to make a web application for my organization (engineering consultant). With the following bullet points that the new web app has to cover, what is the right tool?

  1. It should be able to display employee data and project data. For example, when searching the name of Mr. Peter Parker, I should be able to click on the name to see his personal profile and also a list of construction projects he is or was a part of. Also, if I click on a project name, say Project ABC building, it should show me the detail of this project (who is the client, who works on this project, where, start-finish dates, etc.)

  2. It should be able to sync with the database from Microsoft Access.

(optional) 3. The user of this web app should be able to propose a rotation of role (Ex. Boss might want Mr. Peter Paker to work in another project next month, he can just drag Peter into XYZ Building.)

296k views296k
Comments
Taimoor
Taimoor

Associate Software Engineer at Intech Process Automation

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReactPythonPython

For context, I currently use JavaScript (React) and Python (Flask) in my daily routine.

I need your help in choosing either Spring Boot or ASP.NET Core. Both frameworks seem to have mature ecosystems. I would like to hear your thoughts on the following points:

  • Difficulty level of both frameworks
  • Level of community support
  • Career prospects i.e do Spring based jobs pay more or vice versa
  • which one will be helpful if I decide to transition towards a more specialized field like data engineering.

I am asking this because it is something that I am also exploring in parallel. I know that Python and #SQL play a huge role in big data.

794k views794k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JBoss Seam
JBoss Seam
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core

It is an application framework for Enterprise Java. It is inspired by the following principles: One kind of "stuff" Seam defines a uniform component model for all business logic in your application.

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Solder; Apache DeltaSpike; Seam Catch; Apache DeltaSpike; Seam Config; Apache Aries
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
32
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
51
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8
Stacks
11.0K
Followers
15
Followers
2.7K
Votes
0
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 143
    C#
  • 118
    Performance
  • 96
    Open source
  • 90
    NuGet
  • 84
    Easy to learn and use
Cons
  • 5
    Great Doc
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Clean
  • 2
    Professionally written Nuget Packages, vs IMPORT junk
  • 1
    Long polling is difficult to implement
Integrations
Java
Java
Jira
Jira
Java EE
Java EE
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
macOS
macOS
NGINX
NGINX
.NET
.NET
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Windows
Windows
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to JBoss Seam, ASP.NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase