StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ASP.NET vs Next.js

ASP.NET vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Stacks31.3K
Followers11.8K
Votes40

ASP.NET vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

ASP.NET and Next.js are both popular web development frameworks used for creating dynamic and interactive web applications. While ASP.NET is a framework developed by Microsoft, Next.js is a React-based framework primarily used for building modern web applications. Despite sharing some similarities, there are key differences between ASP.NET and Next.js that developers should be aware of.

  1. Language Compatibility: ASP.NET primarily uses C# for server-side programming, while Next.js uses JavaScript, specifically with Node.js, for both client-side and server-side development. This difference in language compatibility can influence the choice of framework based on a developer's familiarity and preferences.

  2. Server-side Rendering: ASP.NET focuses on server-side rendering, where the HTML is generated on the server before being sent to the client's browser. In contrast, Next.js supports both server-side and client-side rendering, providing flexibility in rendering strategies based on the project requirements.

  3. Library Ecosystem: ASP.NET has a rich library ecosystem provided by Microsoft, offering a wide range of tools and features for web development. Next.js, being a React-based framework, leverages the extensive React ecosystem for building interactive user interfaces and components.

  4. Routing: ASP.NET provides routing through the use of controllers and routes defined in the project structure. Next.js, on the other hand, offers a file-system-based routing system, where routes are defined based on the file structure within the project directory.

  5. Deployment Process: ASP.NET applications are typically deployed on Microsoft IIS servers, requiring specific configurations and setups. In comparison, Next.js applications can be easily deployed on various platforms, including cloud services like Vercel or Netlify, simplifying the deployment process for developers.

  6. Community Support: ASP.NET has a strong community support backed by Microsoft, providing resources, documentation, and updates for developers. Next.js, being an open-source project, benefits from the vast React community, offering community-driven solutions and plugins for enhancing development workflows.

In Summary, ASP.NET and Next.js differ in language compatibility, rendering strategies, library ecosystems, routing mechanisms, deployment processes, and community support, influencing the choice of framework for web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, ASP.NET

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Christopher
Christopher

Web Developer at NurseryPeople

Mar 12, 2020

Decided

When I started on this project as the sole developer, I was new to web development and I was looking at all of the web frameworks available for the job. I had some experience with Ruby on Rails and I had looked into .net for a bit, but when I found Laravel, it felt like the best framework for me to get the product to market. What made me choose Laravel was the easy to read documentation and active community. Rails had great documentation, but lacked some features built in that I wanted out of the box, while .net had a ton of video documentation tutorials, but nothing as straightforward as Laravels. So far, I am happy with the decision I made, and looking forward to the website release!

424k views424k
Comments
i4004
i4004

Sofrware Architect at Air Astana

Feb 1, 2020

Decided

Comparing to ASP.NET Core MVC or ASP.NET Core Web API Simplify.Web allows you to easily build your web-site or REST API without any additional/complicated setup, covering cases like localization by default. It's projects structure very lightweight, just a minimum amount of what you need to setup ASP.NET Core request pipeline.

It is build on top of Simplify.DI IOC container abstraction, no dependency on Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection and it's syntax. You can easily switch between DryIoc, SimpleInjector, CastleWindsor etc.

Any internal module of Simplify.Web can be easily replaced on extended by your custom module, covering your custom cases.

For HTML pages generation Simplify.Templates can be used allowing you to use just regular plain HTML without additional setup.

Can be easily integrated with Simplify.WindowsServices converting your web application not just to web-application, but a standalone windows service which can also do some background jobs via Simplify.WindowsServices.

And it is open source, of course :)

234k views234k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
31.3K
Followers
5.1K
Followers
11.8K
Votes
330
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 21
    Great mvc
  • 13
    Easy to learn
  • 6
    C#
Cons
  • 2
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers
  • 1
    C#
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Next.js, ASP.NET?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase