Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
asyncio vs Sails.js: What are the differences?
asyncio: Asynchronous I/O, event loop, coroutines and tasks. This module provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other related primitives; Sails.js: Realtime MVC Framework for Node.js. Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.
asyncio and Sails.js belong to "Microframeworks (Backend)" category of the tech stack.
Sails.js is an open source tool with 20.7K GitHub stars and 1.85K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Sails.js's open source repository on GitHub.
Redox Engine, HYPH, and LapNghiep are some of the popular companies that use Sails.js, whereas asyncio is used by RolePoint, RapidSOS, and Lamoda.ru. Sails.js has a broader approval, being mentioned in 47 company stacks & 150 developers stacks; compared to asyncio, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.
Pros of asyncio
- Cooperative Multitasking4
- I/O Wait4
- Network Call3
- I/O bound computation2
Pros of Sails.js
- Data-driven apis49
- Waterline ORM47
- Mvc37
- Easy rest32
- Real-time25
- Open source21
- Service-oriented architecture19
- Scalable18
- Convension over configuration10
- Rails-like asset pipeline9
- Node machines and machinepacks9
- Easy route/controller generation7
- Ruby on Rails basic stuff for JS devs6
- CLI for scaffolding project pieces3
- WebSocket support3
- Supportive community1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of asyncio
Cons of Sails.js
- Waterline ORM5
- Defaults to VueJS4
- Standard MVC0