Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Autify vs Playwright: What are the differences?
Autify and Playwright are both software testing tools that are used for automating web applications. However, there are several key differences between these two tools:
Programming Language Support: Autify primarily supports JavaScript and is built on top of Puppeteer, a Node.js library. On the other hand, Playwright supports multiple programming languages including JavaScript, Python, and C#. This allows developers to write test scripts in their preferred language, making it more flexible for teams with diverse skill sets.
Browser Compatibility: Autify supports testing on the Chrome browser only. Playwright, on the other hand, provides cross-browser compatibility and allows testing on Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit. This enables developers to ensure the compatibility of their web applications across multiple browsers.
Parallel Test Execution: Autify allows parallel test execution, which means that multiple tests can be run simultaneously. This significantly reduces the overall test execution time, making it ideal for large-scale test automation. Playwright, however, currently does not have native parallel test execution support. Tests need to be executed sequentially, which may lead to longer test execution times for complex test suites.
Visual Testing: Autify includes built-in visual testing capabilities, which allows developers to easily compare screenshots and identify visual regressions. Playwright does not have native visual testing support, although it can be integrated with third-party visual testing tools to achieve similar functionality.
Test Recorder: Autify provides a test recorder feature, which allows testers to record their interactions with the web application and convert them into automated test scripts. This helps in quickly creating test scripts without writing code from scratch. Playwright does not have a built-in test recorder, and test scripts need to be written manually.
Cloud-based Platform: Autify is a cloud-based platform, which means that the test execution and infrastructure management are handled by Autify's servers. This eliminates the need for setting up and maintaining the testing infrastructure. Playwright, on the other hand, is a framework that needs to be set up locally, requiring developers to manage the infrastructure themselves.
In Summary, Autify and Playwright differ in terms of programming language support, browser compatibility, parallel test execution, visual testing capabilities, test recorder feature, and cloud-based platform. These differences make each tool suitable for different testing scenarios and requirements.
Pros of Autify
- Easy to use4
- Works flexibly for an SPA3
- Cross browser testing3
- Simplify3
Pros of Playwright
- Cross browser14
- Open source10
- Test Runner with Playwright/test9
- Promise based7
- Well documented7
- Execute tests in parallel5
- Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures5
- API Testing5
- Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail4
- Python Support4
- Context isolation3
- Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json3
- Fastest2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Autify
Cons of Playwright
- Less help12
- Node based3
- Does not execute outside of browser2