Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AVA vs Jest vs Mocha: What are the differences?
Introduction
Markdown is a lightweight markup language used to format text that can be easily converted into HTML for displaying on websites. In this task, we will format the content as Markdown code and provide key differences between AVA, Jest, and Mocha, which are popular JavaScript testing frameworks.
Test Runner: AVA is a concurrent test runner, meaning it runs test files simultaneously, reducing the overall execution time. On the other hand, Jest and Mocha both run tests sequentially, executing one test file at a time.
Mocking and Spying: Jest provides built-in mocking and spying functionality, making it easier to create mocks and spies for testing purposes. Although Mocha also has some libraries that offer similar functionality, it lacks native support for these features. AVA, too, does not have built-in mocking and spying capabilities.
Configurability: Mocha provides extensive configurability options, allowing developers to customize the testing environment according to their needs. Jest also offers a good level of configurability with a wide range of configuration options. In contrast, AVA, although flexible, has a more opinionated and minimalistic configuration approach.
Parallel Test Execution: AVA allows tests to run in parallel by default, utilizing the full potential of modern multi-core systems. Jest, while it does support parallel execution, requires additional configuration to operate in parallel effectively. Mocha, on the other hand, executes tests sequentially and does not have built-in support for parallel execution.
Assertion Library: Jest comes with its own assertion library, which provides a wide range of built-in matchers for making assertions in tests. Mocha does not have an assertion library by default but can be combined with libraries like Chai or Should.js to achieve the same functionality. AVA, similar to Mocha, does not include an assertion library but can be used with third-party libraries like Chai or Power Assert.
Test Watcher: When running tests, Jest includes a built-in watch mode that automatically reruns tests whenever changes are detected, making it convenient during development. Mocha and AVA, on the other hand, do not have a built-in test watcher, requiring the use of additional tools like nodemon or chokidar.
In summary, AVA differentiates itself by providing concurrent test execution, but lacks built-in mocking and spying support. Jest offers extensive mocking and spying capabilities with a wide range of configuration options, along with a built-in assertion library. Mocha, a highly configurable testing framework, lacks features like native mocking and spying support and parallel test execution.
As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.
Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.
We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.
Pros of AVA
- Simple and fast12
- Parallel test running6
- Open source5
- Promise support3
- Test code Instrumenting3
- Babel integration2
- ESM Ready1
Pros of Jest
- Open source36
- Mock by default makes testing much simpler32
- Testing React Native Apps23
- Parallel test running20
- Fast16
- Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing13
- Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests8
- Out of the box code coverage7
- Promise support7
- One stop shop for unit testing6
- Great documentation3
- Assert Library Included2
- Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu1
- Preset support1
- Can be used for BDD0
- Karma0
Pros of Mocha
- Open source137
- Simple102
- Promise support81
- Flexible48
- Easy to add support for Generators29
- For browser and server testing12
- Curstom assertion libraries7
- Works with Karma5
- No other better tools3
- Simple setup1
- Works with saucelabs1
- Lots of tutorials and help online1
- Default reporter is nice, clean, and itemized1
- Works with BrowserStack1
- Simple integration testing1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AVA
- No built-in support for DOM1
- No source files compilation1
Cons of Jest
- Documentation4
- Ambiguous configuration4
- Difficult3
- Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting2
- Multiple error messages for same error2
- Difficult to run single test/describe/file2
- Ambiguous2
- Bugged2
- BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail1
- Slow1
- Reporter is too general1
- Unstable1
- Bad docs1
- Still does't support .mjs files natively1
- Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests1
- Interaction with watch mode on terminal0
Cons of Mocha
- Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion3
- No assertion count in results2
- Not as many reporter options as Jest1