Avalonia vs JavaFX

Overview

JavaFX

Stacks280

Followers418

Votes11

Avalonia

Stacks27

Followers113

Votes0

GitHub Stars29.1K

Forks2.5K

Avalonia vs JavaFX: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Language: Avalonia is primarily used with C# and XAML, while JavaFX is built on Java programming language.
Platform Compatibility: Avalonia supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, while JavaFX is cross-platform and compatible with various operating systems.
Rendering Engine: Avalonia utilizes the SkiaSharp graphics library for rendering, whereas JavaFX has its rendering engine based on Prism for 2D and 3D graphics.
Community Support: JavaFX has a larger and more established community compared to Avalonia, providing a wealth of resources and support for developers.
UI Controls: Avalonia offers a more extensive set of custom controls and components out of the box, while JavaFX provides a standard set of controls but supports extensibility for custom implementations.
Tooling: JavaFX is integrated into the Java Development Kit (JDK), making it readily available for Java developers, while Avalonia requires additional setup and configuration for use.

In Summary, Avalonia and JavaFX differ in language support, platform compatibility, rendering engine, community support, available UI controls, and tooling integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

JavaFX	Avalonia
It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.	Avalonia is a multi-platform windowing toolkit - somewhat like WPF - that is intended to be multi- platform. It supports XAML, lookless controls and a flexible styling system, and runs on Windows using Direct2D and other operating systems using Gtk & Cairo.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 29.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.5K
Stacks 280	Stacks 27
Followers 418	Followers 113
Votes 11	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Light Cons 1 Community support less than qt 1 Complicated	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	.NET

What are some alternatives to JavaFX, Avalonia?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Avalonia vs JavaFX: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Language: Avalonia is primarily used with C# and XAML, while JavaFX is built on Java programming language.
Platform Compatibility: Avalonia supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, while JavaFX is cross-platform and compatible with various operating systems.
Rendering Engine: Avalonia utilizes the SkiaSharp graphics library for rendering, whereas JavaFX has its rendering engine based on Prism for 2D and 3D graphics.
Community Support: JavaFX has a larger and more established community compared to Avalonia, providing a wealth of resources and support for developers.
UI Controls: Avalonia offers a more extensive set of custom controls and components out of the box, while JavaFX provides a standard set of controls but supports extensibility for custom implementations.
Tooling: JavaFX is integrated into the Java Development Kit (JDK), making it readily available for Java developers, while Avalonia requires additional setup and configuration for use.

In Summary, Avalonia and JavaFX differ in language support, platform compatibility, rendering engine, community support, available UI controls, and tooling integration.

Avalonia vs JavaFX

Overview