StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Batch vs Azure Functions

AWS Batch vs Azure Functions

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Stacks785
Followers705
Votes62
AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Stacks84
Followers251
Votes6

AWS Batch vs Azure Functions: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will compare AWS Batch and Azure Functions, two popular cloud computing services. We will highlight the key differences between these two services, focusing on specific aspects.

  1. Scalability: AWS Batch offers highly scalable batch processing capabilities, allowing users to efficiently process large volumes of data. It can handle dynamic scaling based on workload demands. On the other hand, Azure Functions provide an event-driven serverless computing platform, allowing users to build and run applications at scale without managing the underlying infrastructure.

  2. Service Model: AWS Batch follows a model where users define job queues and job definitions to run batch computing jobs. It provides a dedicated environment for batch processing. In contrast, Azure Functions follow a Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) model, where users define individual functions that are triggered by specific events or timers. It is designed for event-driven scenarios and offers granular control over function execution.

  3. Integration: AWS Batch integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing users to leverage the full suite of AWS infrastructure and services. It supports integrations with Amazon S3 for data storage and retrieval, Amazon EC2 for compute resources, and other services like AWS CloudFormation and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM). On the other hand, Azure Functions are tightly integrated with Azure services, including Azure Storage, Azure Event Grid, and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to easily build complex workflows within the Azure ecosystem.

  4. Pricing Model: AWS Batch pricing is based on the resources used, including compute instances, storage, and data transfer. Users pay for the compute resources provisioned and the duration of the job execution. Azure Functions pricing is based on the number of executions and resource consumption. Users are billed for each function invocation and the associated resource usage.

  5. Language Support: AWS Batch provides support for a wide range of programming languages, including Python, Java, .NET, and more. Users can choose the programming language that best suits their requirements. Azure Functions also offer support for multiple programming languages, including C#, Java, JavaScript, PowerShell, and Python. This flexibility allows developers to use their preferred language when creating functions.

  6. Scheduling and Triggers: AWS Batch supports scheduling through the integration with Amazon CloudWatch Events. Users can create scheduled events to trigger batch processing jobs at specific times. Azure Functions provide a rich set of triggers, including HTTP request, timer, storage queue, and event grid triggers. These triggers enable users to define precise conditions for function execution.

In summary, AWS Batch and Azure Functions differ in terms of scalability, service model, integration, pricing, language support, and scheduling capabilities. Understanding these differences can help determine the most suitable service for specific use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
AWS Batch
AWS Batch

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Easily schedule event-driven tasks across services;Expose Functions as HTTP API endpoints;Scale Functions based on customer demand;Develop how you want, using a browser-based UI or existing tools;Get continuous deployment, remote debugging, and authentication out of the box
-
Statistics
Stacks
785
Stacks
84
Followers
705
Followers
251
Votes
62
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Pay only when invoked
  • 11
    Great developer experience for C#
  • 9
    Multiple languages supported
  • 7
    Great debugging support
  • 5
    Can be used as lightweight https service
Cons
  • 1
    Sporadic server & language runtime issues
  • 1
    No persistent (writable) file system available
  • 1
    Poor support for Linux environments
  • 1
    Not suited for long-running applications
Pros
  • 3
    Containerized
  • 3
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    More overhead than lambda
  • 1
    Image management
Integrations
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Java
Java
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Node.js
Node.js
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
JavaScript
JavaScript
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
C#
C#
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure Functions, AWS Batch?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

Fission

Fission

Write short-lived functions in any language, and map them to HTTP requests (or other event triggers). Deploy functions instantly with one command. There are no containers to build, and no Docker registries to manage.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase