StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. AWS CodeCommit vs Coverity Scan

AWS CodeCommit vs Coverity Scan

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
Stacks50
Followers185
Votes0
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Stacks324
Followers826
Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Coverity Scan: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit vs. Coverity Scan

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between AWS CodeCommit and Coverity Scan.

  1. Hosting Environment: AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories, whereas Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool for identifying defects in C, C++, and Java code, and it is not a repository hosting service.

  2. Primary Functionality: AWS CodeCommit focuses on version control and collaboration for developers working on software projects, providing features like branch management, pull requests, and code reviews. On the other hand, Coverity Scan is designed specifically for finding and fixing security vulnerabilities and code defects in applications.

  3. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS Lambda to create robust CI/CD pipelines for automated software delivery. Coverity Scan does not provide direct integration with CI/CD pipelines and is primarily used as a standalone tool for code analysis.

  4. Scalability: AWS CodeCommit is designed to scale with the growing needs of development teams working on projects of varying sizes, providing high availability and scalability to accommodate increased workloads. Coverity Scan, while effective for finding issues in small to medium-sized codebases, may face limitations in terms of scalability for large enterprise applications.

  5. Cost Structure: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active users, storage used, and data transfer, offering flexibility for teams of different sizes. Coverity Scan, on the other hand, is a free static analysis tool provided by Synopsys for open source projects, with potential costs for commercial use cases or advanced features.

  6. Language Support: AWS CodeCommit supports Git repositories for any programming language, providing flexibility for teams working with a variety of codebases. Coverity Scan, on the other hand, focuses specifically on C, C++, and Java languages, offering in-depth analysis and security checks tailored to these languages.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and Coverity Scan cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle, with AWS CodeCommit focusing on version control and collaboration, while Coverity Scan specializes in static analysis for identifying code defects and vulnerabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks
50
Stacks
324
Followers
185
Followers
826
Votes
0
Votes
193
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
Cons
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    NO LFS support
  • 2
    No fork
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Coverity Scan, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana