Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit

332
826
+ 1
193
TortoiseSVN

52
116
+ 1
2
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

  1. Repository Type: AWS CodeCommit is a managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories, whereas TortoiseSVN is a client-side Subversion (SVN) client that interacts with central repositories.
  2. Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline for automated build and deployment processes, while TortoiseSVN requires additional plugins or third-party tools for similar integrations.
  3. Scalability: AWS CodeCommit is designed to handle large-scale projects and multiple repositories effortlessly, making it preferable for enterprise-level applications with high scalability demands, whereas TortoiseSVN may face performance issues or limitations with extensive repositories or large teams.
  4. Access Control: AWS CodeCommit provides fine-grained access control through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, allowing administrators to specify who can access repositories and what actions they can perform, while TortoiseSVN relies on server-side permission settings which may not be as versatile.
  5. Pricing Model: AWS CodeCommit follows an pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active users and the amount of data stored, which can be cost-effective for small to mid-sized teams, while TortoiseSVN is open-source and free to use but may incur costs for additional features or support services.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and TortoiseSVN differ in repository type, integration with AWS services, scalability, access control, and pricing model.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of AWS CodeCommit
Pros of TortoiseSVN
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
  • 11
    I can make repository by myself if I have AWS account
  • 11
    Faster deployments when using other AWS services
  • 8
    AWS CodePipeline integration
  • 6
    Codebuild integration
  • 6
    Does not support web hooks yet! :(
  • 4
    Cost Effective
  • 2
    No Git LFS! Dealbreaker for me
  • 2
    Elastic Beanstalk Integration
  • 2
    Integrated with AWS Ecosystem
  • 1
    Integration via SQS/SNS for events (replaces webhooks)
  • 1
    IAM
  • 1
    Issue tracker
  • 1
    Available in Ireland (Dublin) region
  • 1
    CodeDeploy Integration
  • 1
    CodeCommit Trigger for an AWS Lambda Function
  • 1
    Open source friendly
  • 1
    Only US Region
  • 0
    Ui
  • 2
    Easy to use

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeCommit
Cons of TortoiseSVN
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    Bad diffing/no blame
  • 2
    NO LFS support
  • 2
    No fork
  • 2
    No webhooks
  • 1
    Can't download file from UI
  • 1
    Only time based triggers
  • 0
    Accident-prone UI
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    253
    576
    269
    4.9K
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is AWS CodeCommit?

    CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

    What is TortoiseSVN?

    It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
    What companies use TortoiseSVN?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
    What tools integrate with TortoiseSVN?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and TortoiseSVN?
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    GitHub Enterprise
    GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
    SVN (Subversion)
    Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
    See all alternatives