AWS CodePipeline vs Yarn

Overview

AWS CodePipeline

Stacks551

Followers933

Votes30

Yarn

Stacks28.2K

Followers13.5K

Votes151

GitHub Stars41.5K

Forks2.7K

AWS CodePipeline vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of cloud computing and software development, AWS CodePipeline and Yarn are two important tools with distinct features and functionalities.

1. Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline is tightly integrated with various AWS services such as CodeBuild and CodeDeploy, allowing seamless deployment and automation of pipelines within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Yarn is a package manager specifically designed for managing project dependencies in JavaScript projects without direct integration with AWS services.

2. Focus on Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): AWS CodePipeline is primarily focused on enabling CI/CD workflows by automating the build, test, and deployment phases of a software delivery process. In contrast, Yarn is more focused on managing packages and dependencies for JavaScript projects, providing a stable and reliable way to control project dependencies.

3. Vendor Lock-in: AWS CodePipeline is a service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which may result in vendor lock-in for users who heavily rely on AWS services for their infrastructure and deployment workflows. On the other hand, Yarn is an open-source package manager that offers more flexibility and independence from specific cloud providers.

4. Scalability and Customization Options: AWS CodePipeline offers scalability and customization options for building complex CI/CD pipelines with multiple stages and actions, suitable for enterprise-level applications. Conversely, Yarn focuses on simplifying package management and dependency resolution without providing advanced customization features for CI/CD workflows.

5. Cost Implications: AWS CodePipeline is a managed service that incurs costs based on usage and the resources consumed during the development and deployment processes. In comparison, Yarn is a free and open-source tool for managing project dependencies, often preferred for its cost-effectiveness in smaller-scale projects with limited budget considerations.

6. Programming Language Support: AWS CodePipeline supports a wide range of programming languages and build tools, offering flexibility for developers working on diverse projects. Yarn, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript projects, catering to the needs of Node.js developers for managing dependencies efficiently.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline and Yarn differ in integration with AWS services, focus on CI/CD, vendor lock-in, scalability, cost implications, and programming language support, catering to distinct needs in software development and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AWS CodePipeline, Yarn

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

Reviewon

Yarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodePipeline	Yarn
CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.	Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 41.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.7K
Stacks 551	Stacks 28.2K
Followers 933	Followers 13.5K
Votes 30	Votes 151
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Simple to set up 8 Managed service 4 GitHub integration 3 Parallel Execution 2 Automatic deployment Cons 2 No project boards 1 No integration with "Power" 365 tools	Pros 85 Incredibly fast 22 Easy to use 13 Open Source 11 Can install any npm package 8 Works where npm fails Cons 16 Facebook 7 Sends data to facebook 4 Should be installed separately 3 Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
Runscope Amazon S3 GitHub Jenkins CloudBees BlazeMeter Ghost Inspector AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2	JavaScript npm

What are some alternatives to AWS CodePipeline, Yarn?

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of cloud computing and software development, AWS CodePipeline and Yarn are two important tools with distinct features and functionalities.

AWS CodePipeline vs Yarn

Overview