StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs IBM Bluemix

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs IBM Bluemix

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes241
IBM Bluemix
IBM Bluemix
Stacks35
Followers17
Votes0

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs IBM Bluemix: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk and IBM Bluemix are both platforms that offer cloud-based solutions for building, deploying, and managing applications. However, there are key differences between these two platforms that cater to different needs and preferences.

  1. Programming Language Support: AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports a wide range of programming languages including Java, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, and Docker. On the other hand, IBM Bluemix offers support for popular languages like Java, Node.js, Swift, PHP, and Ruby, but also provides additional support for less common languages like Erlang and R.

  2. Pricing Model: AWS Elastic Beanstalk follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users pay only for the resources they consume. In contrast, IBM Bluemix offers flexible pricing options including a pay-as-you-go model as well as a subscription-based model that provides discounted rates for long-term commitments.

  3. Integration with Other Services: AWS Elastic Beanstalk seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as RDS, S3, and DynamoDB, allowing for easy scalability and flexibility. IBM Bluemix, on the other hand, provides integration with various IBM services including Watson, IoT, and Cloudant, offering a unique set of capabilities for different types of applications.

  4. Deployment Options: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides multiple deployment options including web-based console, CLI, and APIs for automation. In contrast, IBM Bluemix offers a user-friendly web interface that allows for easy deployment of applications without the need for extensive technical knowledge or expertise.

  5. Scalability and Performance: Both AWS Elastic Beanstalk and IBM Bluemix offer auto-scaling capabilities to manage the performance of applications based on demand. However, AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides more granular control over scalability settings, allowing users to fine-tune performance based on specific requirements.

  6. Community and Support: AWS Elastic Beanstalk has a larger user community and extensive documentation, making it easier for users to find solutions to common problems and receive support from the community. IBM Bluemix, while also offering support and documentation, may have a smaller user base and community compared to AWS Elastic Beanstalk.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk and IBM Bluemix differ in terms of programming language support, pricing model, integration with other services, deployment options, scalability and performance features, and community support, catering to different needs and preferences of users.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
IBM Bluemix
IBM Bluemix

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

It is an open standards, cloud platform for building, running, and managing apps and services. It supports several programming languages and services as well as integrated DevOps to build, run, deploy and manage applications on the cloud.

Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java;There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.;Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application;Impossible to outgrow – Elastic Beanstalk automatically scales your application up and down based on default Auto Scaling settings;Complete control – Elastic Beanstalk lets you "open the hood" and retain full control over the AWS resources powering your application;Flexible – You have the freedom to select the Amazon EC2 instance type that is optimal for your application based on CPU and memory requirements, and can choose from several available database options;Reliable – Elastic Beanstalk runs within Amazon's proven network infrastructure and datacenters, and provides an environment where developers can run applications requiring high durability and availability.
-
Statistics
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
35
Followers
1.8K
Followers
17
Votes
241
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
Cons
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Papertrail
Papertrail
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk, IBM Bluemix?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase