StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. AWS WAF vs CyberArk

AWS WAF vs CyberArk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Stacks164
Followers191
Votes0
CyberArk
CyberArk
Stacks44
Followers72
Votes0

AWS WAF vs CyberArk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS WAF and CyberArk

  1. Purpose: AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect web applications from common web exploits, whereas CyberArk is a privileged access management solution that secures and manages privileged account credentials.

  2. Scope: AWS WAF focuses on protecting web applications from attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and other OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, while CyberArk is more focused on securing and managing privileged account access, session monitoring, and threat detection.

  3. Deployment: AWS WAF is a cloud-based solution provided by Amazon Web Services and is integrated with other AWS services, while CyberArk can be deployed both on-premises and in the cloud to provide centralized control over privileged account access across an organization.

  4. Integration: AWS WAF integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, AWS Shield, and AWS Firewall Manager, providing comprehensive protection for web applications hosted on AWS, whereas CyberArk integrates with various third-party security tools, identity management solutions, and IT infrastructure components to provide a holistic privileged access management solution.

  5. User Interface: AWS WAF offers a user-friendly console for configuration and monitoring of web application firewall rules and policies, while CyberArk provides a feature-rich interface for managing privileged accounts, access policies, and monitoring privileged account activity.

  6. Compliance: AWS WAF helps organizations comply with industry standards and regulations related to web application security, such as PCI DSS and HIPAA, by protecting against common web vulnerabilities, whereas CyberArk helps organizations comply with regulations such as SOX, GDPR, and NIST by securing privileged account access and ensuring accountability for privileged actions.

In Summary, AWS WAF focuses on web application security, while CyberArk focuses on privileged access management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS WAF
AWS WAF
CyberArk
CyberArk

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.

It is the only security software company focused on eliminating cyber threats using insider privileges to attack the heart of the enterprise.

-
Email attachment protection; Credential protection and management; Session isolation and monitoring; Threat detection and analytics; End-to-end server protection; Domain controller protection; Activity monitoring; In-progress Kerberos attack detection
Statistics
Stacks
164
Stacks
44
Followers
191
Followers
72
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Sentry
Sentry
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Mingle
Mingle

What are some alternatives to AWS WAF, CyberArk?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope