Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS WAF

162
187
+ 1
0
Imperva

10
19
+ 1
0
Add tool

AWS WAF vs Imperva: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will compare AWS WAF and Imperva to highlight their key differences.

  1. Deployment Model: AWS WAF is a cloud-based web application firewall service provided by Amazon Web Services, allowing customers to deploy and manage their web application protection entirely in the cloud. On the other hand, Imperva provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, offering customers more flexibility in choosing the deployment model that best fits their specific requirements.

  2. Integration with CDN: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with Amazon CloudFront, a content delivery network service also provided by Amazon Web Services, enabling customers to easily protect their web applications delivered through CloudFront. In contrast, Imperva offers its own CDN solution called Imperva CDN, ensuring tight integration between their web application firewall and content delivery network services for enhanced security and performance.

  3. Advanced Threat Intelligence: Imperva is known for its advanced threat intelligence capabilities, providing customers with real-time threat intelligence feeds and security research insights to proactively defend against evolving cyber threats. While AWS WAF also offers some threat intelligence features, Imperva's focus on advanced threat detection and prevention sets it apart as a comprehensive security solution.

  4. Granular Control and Customization: Imperva provides customers with granular control over security policies and configurations, allowing them to customize rules and settings to meet their specific security requirements. This level of customization enables organizations to tailor their web application protection strategies according to their unique threat landscape. In comparison, AWS WAF offers a more standardized set of security rules and configurations, limiting the level of customization available to customers.

  5. Management Interface: AWS WAF is tightly integrated with the AWS Management Console, providing users with a familiar interface for managing their web application firewall configurations alongside other AWS services. In contrast, Imperva offers a more specialized management interface through its web application security platform, providing users with dedicated tools and features for efficiently managing their web application security posture.

  6. Scalability and Performance: AWS WAF is designed to scale seamlessly with the growing demands of web applications, leveraging the reliability and scalability of the AWS cloud infrastructure to deliver high performance under heavy traffic loads. Imperva also offers scalability and performance capabilities, but its focus on comprehensive security features may impact performance to some extent compared to AWS WAF's optimized performance at scale.

In Summary, the key differences between AWS WAF and Imperva lie in their deployment models, integration with CDN, advanced threat intelligence capabilities, level of granular control and customization, management interfaces, and scalability/performance characteristics.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More

What is AWS WAF?

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.

What is Imperva?

It provides complete cyber security by protecting what really matters most—your data and applications—whether on-premises or in the cloud.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AWS WAF?
What companies use Imperva?
    No companies found
    See which teams inside your own company are using AWS WAF or Imperva.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to AWS WAF and Imperva?
    CloudFlare
    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.
    Incapsula
    Through an application-aware, global content delivery network (CDN), Incapsula provides any website and web application with best-of-breed security, DDoS protection, load balancing and failover solutions.
    AWS Shield
    AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards web applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.
    F5
    It powers apps from development through their entire life cycle, so our customers can deliver differentiated, high-performing, and secure digital experiences.
    Akamai
    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward.
    See all alternatives