StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. SuperTest vs axios

SuperTest vs axios

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SuperTest
SuperTest
Stacks1.9K
Followers102
Votes0
axios
axios
Stacks6.7K
Followers419
Votes0
GitHub Stars108.1K
Forks11.4K

SuperTest vs axios: What are the differences?

Introduction

The purpose of this task is to provide a comparison between SuperTest and axios and highlight the key differences between the two libraries.

  1. Request Abstraction: SuperTest is specifically designed to test HTTP servers, making it an ideal choice for testing APIs and server-side code. It provides a high-level abstraction for making HTTP requests and includes features for assertions and response handling to simplify testing. On the other hand, axios is a lightweight JavaScript library that can be used in both client-side and server-side applications. It focuses on providing a simple and intuitive API for making HTTP requests without any specific testing features.

  2. Testing Capability: SuperTest is primarily used for testing purposes with its built-in support for assertions and response handling. It allows developers to easily verify different aspects of HTTP responses, such as status codes, headers, and response bodies. In contrast, axios does not provide built-in testing capabilities and is more suited for general-purpose HTTP requests in real applications. It does not offer specific features to validate HTTP response details as SuperTest does.

  3. Integration with Testing Frameworks: SuperTest is commonly used alongside testing frameworks like Mocha or Jest to write and execute test cases. It seamlessly integrates with these frameworks, providing additional functionalities like request chaining and test-driven assertions. On the other hand, axios is a standalone library that can be used with any framework or without any framework at all. It does not have any direct integration with testing frameworks and is more flexible in terms of usage.

  4. Request Configuration and Customization: SuperTest allows developers to easily customize and configure requests by providing various methods and options. It supports different HTTP methods, URL parameters, query parameters, request headers, and request bodies. It also supports sending files and cookies in requests. In contrast, axios provides a more simplified request configuration. It supports HTTP methods, URL parameters, query parameters, and request headers. It does not have direct support for sending files or cookies in requests.

  5. Promises and Async/Await: SuperTest uses Promises for handling asynchronous operations and allows developers to use async/await syntax for more readable test code. It provides a fluent API for chaining multiple requests in a sequence. Conversely, axios also uses Promises but does not provide a native support for async/await syntax. Developers can handle asynchronous operations in axios using traditional .then() and .catch() methods.

  6. Browser Support: SuperTest is primarily geared towards server-side testing and does not have support for browser environments. It is meant to be used in Node.js applications. On the other hand, axios is designed to work in both browser and Node.js environments. It can be used to make HTTP requests from client-side JavaScript code as well.

In summary, SuperTest is a specialized library for testing HTTP servers, whereas axios is a lightweight HTTP client library suitable for general-purpose HTTP requests. SuperTest provides built-in testing features and integrates well with testing frameworks, while axios offers simplicity and flexibility in request handling without any specific testing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SuperTest
SuperTest
axios
axios

It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.

It is a Javascript library used to make http requests from node.js or XMLHttpRequests from the browser and it supports the Promise API that is native to JS ES6.

HTTP assertions;Asynchronous;Promise support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
108.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
11.4K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
6.7K
Followers
102
Followers
419
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to SuperTest, axios?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot