StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Azure Active Directory vs Keycloak

Azure Active Directory vs Keycloak

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks783
Followers1.3K
Votes102
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Stacks697
Followers283
Votes6

Keycloak vs Azure Active Directory: What are the differences?

Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and Keycloak are identity and access management solutions that provide authentication, authorization, and user management capabilities. Let's explore the key differences between them:

  1. Deployment Model: Azure Active Directory is a cloud-based identity and access management service provided by Microsoft. It is tightly integrated with other Microsoft Azure services and is designed to be used within the Azure ecosystem. On the other hand, Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution that can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud. Keycloak provides flexibility in deployment options and can be installed and managed by organizations independently.

  2. Integration with Ecosystem: Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) integrates closely with Microsoft's ecosystem, encompassing Azure services, Office 365, and Microsoft 365. It ensures smooth integration with Microsoft applications, enabling single sign-on (SSO) and centralized user management. On the other hand, Keycloak, an open-source solution, supports diverse platforms and frameworks by leveraging widely adopted standards like SAML, OpenID Connect, and OAuth2. It offers the flexibility to integrate with various applications and systems.

  3. Feature Set: Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) provides a wide range of features for identity and access management, including user authentication, multi-factor authentication, conditional access policies, RBAC, and federation with external identity providers. It also offers device and application management functionalities. Keycloak, an open-source solution, offers similar authentication and authorization capabilities, supporting protocols like SAML, OpenID Connect, and OAuth2. It includes features such as user federation, SSO, and granular access control.

  4. Enterprise Capabilities: Azure Active Directory is designed to cater to the needs of enterprises, providing features like advanced security and compliance controls. It offers features such as identity protection, privileged identity management, and security monitoring. Azure AD also provides integration options with Azure AD B2C, which is designed specifically for customer-facing applications. Keycloak, being an open-source solution, may not have the same level of enterprise-focused features out-of-the-box. However, it can be extended and customized to meet specific enterprise requirements.

  5. Scalability and Performance: Azure Active Directory is a managed service provided by Microsoft, which ensures scalability and high-performance. It is designed to handle millions of users and supports high availability and load balancing. Keycloak, as an open-source solution, can also scale based on the deployment choices made by organizations. It can be deployed in a distributed manner to handle large user bases and high loads, but organizations need to manage the scalability and performance aspects themselves.

In summary, Azure Active Directory is a cloud-based identity and access management service tightly integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem. It provides comprehensive features, enterprise capabilities, and scalability within the Azure environment. Keycloak, on the other hand, is an open-source identity and access management solution that offers flexibility in deployment options and integration with various platforms. It provides similar authentication and authorization capabilities but requires organizations to manage the infrastructure and customization aspects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Keycloak, Azure Active Directory

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

Statistics
Stacks
783
Stacks
697
Followers
1.3K
Followers
283
Votes
102
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
Pros
  • 6
    Backed by Microsoft Azure
Cons
  • 3
    Closed source

What are some alternatives to Keycloak, Azure Active Directory?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope