Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB

156
146
+ 1
55
CouchDB
CouchDB

287
245
+ 1
136
Add tool

Azure Cosmos DB vs CouchDB: What are the differences?

Azure Cosmos DB: A fully-managed, globally distributed NoSQL database service. Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development; CouchDB: HTTP + JSON document database with Map Reduce views and peer-based replication. Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.

Azure Cosmos DB and CouchDB are primarily classified as "NoSQL Database as a Service" and "Databases" tools respectively.

"Best-of-breed NoSQL features" is the top reason why over 13 developers like Azure Cosmos DB, while over 41 developers mention "JSON" as the leading cause for choosing CouchDB.

CouchDB is an open source tool with 4.22K GitHub stars and 833 GitHub forks. Here's a link to CouchDB's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, CouchDB has a broader approval, being mentioned in 60 company stacks & 30 developers stacks; compared to Azure Cosmos DB, which is listed in 24 company stacks and 23 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Azure Cosmos DB?

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

What is CouchDB?

Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Azure Cosmos DB?
Why do developers choose CouchDB?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Azure Cosmos DB?
    What companies use CouchDB?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Azure Cosmos DB?
    What tools integrate with CouchDB?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Azure Cosmos DB and CouchDB?
    Azure SQL Database
    It is the intelligent, scalable, cloud database service that provides the broadest SQL Server engine compatibility and up to a 212% return on investment. It is a database service that can quickly and efficiently scale to meet demand, is automatically highly available, and supports a variety of third party software.
    MongoDB Atlas
    MongoDB Atlas is a global cloud database service built and run by the team behind MongoDB. Enjoy the flexibility and scalability of a document database, with the ease and automation of a fully managed service on your preferred cloud.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    Amazon DynamoDB
    With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
    Cloud Firestore
    Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Azure Cosmos DB and CouchDB
    Josh Dzielak
    Josh Dzielak
    Developer Advocate at DeveloperMode | 5 upvotes 23.4K views
    Cloudant
    Cloudant
    CouchDB
    CouchDB
    Pouchdb
    Pouchdb
    Firebase
    Firebase

    As a side project, I was building a note taking app that needed to synchronize between the client and the server so that it would work offline. At first I used Firebase to store the data on the server and wrote my own code to cache Firebase data in local storage and synchronize it. This was brittle and not performant. I figured that someone else must have solved this in a better way so I went looking for a better solution.

    I needed a tool where I could write the data once and it would write to client and server, and when clients came back on line they would automatically catch the client up. I also needed conflict resolution. I was thrilled to discover Pouchdb and its server-side counterpart CouchDB. Together, they met nearly all of my requirements and were very easy to implement - I was able to remove a ton of custom code and have found the synchronization to be very robust. Pouchdb 7 has improved mobile support too, so I can run the app on iOS or Android browsers.

    My Couchdb instance is actually a Cloudant instance running on IBM Bluemix. For my fairly low level of API usage, it's been totally free, and it has a decent GUI for managing users and replications.

    See more
    Jonathan Pugh
    Jonathan Pugh
    Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect | 18 upvotes 173.5K views
    Pouchdb
    Pouchdb
    CouchDB
    CouchDB
    Font Awesome
    Font Awesome
    CSS 3
    CSS 3
    Apache Cordova
    Apache Cordova
    PhoneGap
    PhoneGap
    HTML5
    HTML5
    Ruby
    Ruby
    Babel
    Babel
    Webpack
    Webpack
    Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code
    Figma
    Figma
    TypeScript
    TypeScript
    JavaScript
    JavaScript
    Framework7
    Framework7
    #Css
    #CSS3
    #SCSS
    #Sass
    #Less
    #Electron
    #HandleBars
    #Template7
    #Sketch
    #GraphQL
    #HTML5
    #GraphCool

    I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

    For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

    Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

    I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

    I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

    I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

    I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

    For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

    For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

    For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

    I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

    So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Azure Cosmos DB and CouchDB
    No reviews found
    How developers use Azure Cosmos DB and CouchDB
    Avatar of King's Digital Lab
    King's Digital Lab uses CouchDBCouchDB

    Document (JSON) DB.

    • - queries must be pre-defined as views (not as flexible as query formulation on the fly)
    • - community and ecosystem not as large as mongodb
    • + PouchDB is an excellent JS library to interact with CouchDB or even work in offline-then-sync moce
    Avatar of Smileupps
    Smileupps uses CouchDBCouchDB

    By being built on, of, in and around CouchDB, Smileupps offers to its customers secure and reliable CouchDB hosting and a CouchDB-based app store to build and sell serious business-enabled web applications

    Avatar of Daniel Kovacs
    Daniel Kovacs uses Azure Cosmos DBAzure Cosmos DB

    If you need a document-based database with geo-redundancy (imagine AU-HU distance), this is the way to go.

    Avatar of Giant Swarm
    Giant Swarm uses CouchDBCouchDB

    We use CouchDB in an internal analysis tool for usage data.

    Avatar of Mathias Vonende
    Mathias Vonende uses CouchDBCouchDB

    Storage for unstructured, linked and timeseries data.

    Avatar of Aaron Buchanan
    Aaron Buchanan uses CouchDBCouchDB

    json store + geo + _changes

    How much does Azure Cosmos DB cost?
    How much does CouchDB cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    News about CouchDB
    More news