StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. Azure Functions vs Zoho Catalyst

Azure Functions vs Zoho Catalyst

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Stacks785
Followers705
Votes62
Zoho Catalyst
Zoho Catalyst
Stacks9
Followers24
Votes0

Azure Functions vs Zoho Catalyst: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Models: Azure Functions are serverless computing platforms provided by Microsoft Azure, allowing users to develop and run event-triggered code without managing infrastructure. On the other hand, Zoho Catalyst is a serverless platform by Zoho that offers a variety of deployment models, including private, public, and hybrid clouds, providing more flexibility to users for deploying functions based on their requirements.
  2. Supported Languages: Azure Functions support a wide range of programming languages such as C#, JavaScript, Python, and Java to develop serverless functions. In contrast, Zoho Catalyst primarily supports Node.js for serverless function development, limiting the language options available to developers.
  3. Integration Capabilities: Azure Functions have extensive integrations with other Azure services, enabling seamless interaction with Azure Storage, Azure Cosmos DB, Azure SQL Database, and more. On the contrary, Zoho Catalyst is tightly integrated with the Zoho suite of applications, enabling users to easily connect serverless functions with Zoho CRM, Zoho Creator, Zoho Desk, and other Zoho products.
  4. Pricing Structure: Azure Functions use a consumption-based pricing model, where users pay only for the resources consumed by their functions. In contrast, Zoho Catalyst offers a predictable pricing model with fixed monthly charges based on the selected plan, providing users with cost predictability for their serverless workloads.
  5. Scalability Options: Azure Functions can automatically scale based on demand, ensuring high availability and performance for applications during peak times. Zoho Catalyst also offers scalability features but may have limitations in terms of scaling compared to the scalability options available in Azure Functions.
  6. Monitoring and Logging: Azure Functions provide robust monitoring and logging capabilities through Azure Monitor, enabling users to track function performance, errors, and resource utilization efficiently. Zoho Catalyst offers basic monitoring features, but it may lack the comprehensive monitoring and logging options available in the Azure ecosystem.

In Summary, Azure Functions offer broader language support, extensive Azure integrations, and flexible pricing models, while Zoho Catalyst provides deployment flexibility, tight integration with Zoho applications, and predictable pricing for serverless functions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Zoho Catalyst
Zoho Catalyst

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

It is a serverless development platform that helps developers build applications, APIs, microservices, and more with the help of serverless functions, databases, filestores, and other useful components and APIs.

Easily schedule event-driven tasks across services;Expose Functions as HTTP API endpoints;Scale Functions based on customer demand;Develop how you want, using a browser-based UI or existing tools;Get continuous deployment, remote debugging, and authentication out of the box
Serverless Functions; Serverless Relational database; File storage; OCR, Object detection; Function orchestration
Statistics
Stacks
785
Stacks
9
Followers
705
Followers
24
Votes
62
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Pay only when invoked
  • 11
    Great developer experience for C#
  • 9
    Multiple languages supported
  • 7
    Great debugging support
  • 5
    Can be used as lightweight https service
Cons
  • 1
    Poor support for Linux environments
  • 1
    Sporadic server & language runtime issues
  • 1
    Not suited for long-running applications
  • 1
    No persistent (writable) file system available
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Java
Java
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Node.js
Node.js
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
JavaScript
JavaScript
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
C#
C#
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Azure Functions, Zoho Catalyst?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

AWS Batch

AWS Batch

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase