StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Infrastructure Build Tools
  5. Azure Resource Manager vs Hashicorp Sentinel

Azure Resource Manager vs Hashicorp Sentinel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Resource Manager
Azure Resource Manager
Stacks40
Followers93
Votes11
GitHub Stars64
Forks47
Hashicorp Sentinel
Hashicorp Sentinel
Stacks25
Followers28
Votes0

Azure Resource Manager vs Hashicorp Sentinel: What are the differences?

Azure Resource Manager (ARM) and HashiCorp Sentinel are two tools used in the field of cloud computing. While both technologies play a role in managing and deploying resources in the cloud, they have key differences that differentiate them.
  1. Deployment Methodology: Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is a cloud management service provided by Microsoft Azure that allows users to provision, deploy, and manage resources in a declarative manner. It enables infrastructure as code and provides a centralized way of managing resources. On the other hand, HashiCorp Sentinel is a policy-as-code framework that evaluates and enforces policies across different cloud platforms and infrastructures. It focuses on defining and enforcing specific constraints or rules on resource deployments.

  2. Scope of Application: Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is designed specifically for managing Azure resources and services. It is tightly integrated with Azure and provides capabilities for provisioning and managing resources within the Azure ecosystem. On the other hand, HashiCorp Sentinel is a more agnostic tool that can be used to enforce policies across multiple cloud providers, including Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. It provides a consistent way of defining and enforcing policies across heterogeneous environments.

  3. Policy Enforcement: Azure Resource Manager (ARM) primarily focuses on resource provisioning and management, rather than policy enforcement. While it does provide some level of policy enforcement through its Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) mechanisms, it is not as feature-rich as HashiCorp Sentinel. HashiCorp Sentinel, on the other hand, is specifically designed for policy enforcement and can define and enforce fine-grained policies for resource deployments. It enables organizations to define their own custom policies and ensures compliance with security, governance, and operational standards.

  4. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is closely integrated with Azure DevOps and provides seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines. It enables developers to define their infrastructure as code and include it as part of their CI/CD workflows. HashiCorp Sentinel, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for CI/CD integration. It can be used alongside CI/CD pipelines, but the integration may require additional configuration and setup.

  5. Community Support and Ecosystem: Azure Resource Manager (ARM) has a large and active user community due to its close integration with Azure. It has a broad ecosystem of tools and resources that support infrastructure as code and ARM template development. HashiCorp Sentinel, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community. It is part of the broader HashiCorp ecosystem, which includes other tools like Terraform and Vault. Users of HashiCorp Sentinel can benefit from the community support and resources available within this ecosystem.

  6. Cost and Pricing Model: Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is provided as a service by Microsoft Azure and is included in the pricing structure of Azure services. There is no separate cost for using ARM. On the other hand, HashiCorp Sentinel is part of the HashiCorp Cloud Platform's pricing model. Users of HashiCorp Sentinel need to consider the pricing and licensing implications when using this tool.

In Summary, Azure Resource Manager (ARM) focuses on resource provisioning and management within the Azure ecosystem, while HashiCorp Sentinel specializes in policy enforcement across multiple cloud platforms. ARM is tightly integrated with Azure and provides native support for Azure resources, while Sentinel is an agnostic tool that ensures compliance and policy enforcement in heterogeneous environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Resource Manager
Azure Resource Manager
Hashicorp Sentinel
Hashicorp Sentinel

It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.

Sentinel is an embeddable policy as code framework to enable fine-grained, logic-based policy decisions that can be extended to source external information to make decisions.

Deploy app resources; Organize resources; Control access to resources
policy as code;Fine-grained, condition-based policy; Multiple enforcement levels; Multi-cloud compatible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
64
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
47
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40
Stacks
25
Followers
93
Followers
28
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Bicep - Simple Declarative Language
  • 2
    RBAC and Policies in templates
  • 1
    Infrastructure-as-Code
  • 1
    Deep integration with Azure services like Azure Policy
  • 1
    Over 1K samples the QuickStart repo
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Ruby
Ruby
Terraform
Terraform
rkt
rkt
Nomad
Nomad
Vault
Vault
Terraform
Terraform
Consul
Consul

What are some alternatives to Azure Resource Manager, Hashicorp Sentinel?

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Pulumi

Pulumi

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

Habitat

Habitat

Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.

AWS Cloud Development Kit

AWS Cloud Development Kit

It is an open source software development framework to model and provision your cloud application resources using familiar programming languages. It uses the familiarity and expressive power of programming languages for modeling your applications. It provides you with high-level components that preconfigure cloud resources with proven defaults, so you can build cloud applications without needing to be an expert.

Yocto

Yocto

It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed.

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

Atlas

Atlas

Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana