StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Azure Search vs Lucene

Azure Search vs Lucene

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Search
Azure Search
Stacks84
Followers224
Votes16
Lucene
Lucene
Stacks175
Followers230
Votes2

Azure Search vs Lucene: What are the differences?

Key differences between Azure Search and Lucene in a website

Azure Search is a cloud-based search-as-a-service solution offered by Microsoft, while Lucene is an open-source information retrieval library for full-text search. Both have their unique features and functionalities that sets them apart. Here are the key differences between Azure Search and Lucene:

  1. Scalability and Maintenance: Azure Search is a fully managed service that eliminates the need for infrastructure management and maintenance. It offers automatic scaling, making it easier to handle increasing workloads. On the other hand, Lucene requires manual deployment and configuration, making it more suitable for smaller projects with limited scalability requirements.

  2. Ease of Use: Azure Search provides a user-friendly interface and a set of RESTful APIs, making it easy to implement search functionality without deep knowledge of search technologies. Lucene, however, requires developers to write complex code to interact with the library, making it more suitable for experienced developers who require more control and customization.

  3. Feature Set: Azure Search offers a rich set of built-in features such as faceted navigation, filtering, highlighting, and geographic search, which can be easily integrated into applications. Lucene provides a lower-level API that gives developers more flexibility to build custom search solutions, but requires more development effort to implement advanced features.

  4. Index Management: Azure Search provides a centralized management system for creating, updating, and monitoring search indexes. It also supports automatic indexing and synchronizes data from different data sources. In contrast, Lucene requires developers to manually handle index creation, updating, and optimization, making index management more complex and time-consuming.

  5. Query Language: Azure Search uses a simplified query language called OData, which allows developers to write queries using familiar syntax and supports advanced search capabilities. Lucene, on the other hand, uses its own query syntax based on Boolean expressions and allows for more fine-grained control over query execution and scoring.

  6. Deployment Options: Azure Search is a cloud-based service that can be easily integrated into Azure-hosted applications. It offers seamless integration with other Azure services such as Azure Functions and Azure Logic Apps. Lucene, being an open-source library, can be deployed on any compatible server or hosting environment, giving developers more flexibility in choosing their deployment options.

In Summary, Azure Search is a fully managed cloud service with built-in features, scalability, and ease of use, while Lucene provides more flexibility and control for developers who need to build custom search solutions in specific hosting environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Search
Azure Search
Lucene
Lucene

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

Lucene Core, our flagship sub-project, provides Java-based indexing and search technology, as well as spellchecking, hit highlighting and advanced analysis/tokenization capabilities.

Powerful, reliable performance;Easily tune search indices to meet business goals;Scale out simply;Enable sophisticated search functionality;Get up and running quickly;Simplify search index management
over 150GB/hour on modern hardware;small RAM requirements -- only 1MB heap;incremental indexing as fast as batch indexing;index size roughly 20-30% the size of text indexed;ranked searching -- best results returned first;many powerful query types: phrase queries, wildcard queries, proximity queries, range queries;fielded searching (e.g. title, author, contents);sorting by any field;multiple-index searching with merged results;allows simultaneous update and searching;flexible faceting, highlighting, joins and result grouping;fast, memory-efficient and typo-tolerant suggesters;pluggable ranking models, including the Vector Space Model and Okapi BM25;configurable storage engine (codecs)
Statistics
Stacks
84
Stacks
175
Followers
224
Followers
230
Votes
16
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to set up
  • 3
    Managed
  • 3
    Auto-Scaling
  • 2
    Lucene based search criteria
  • 2
    Easy Setup
Pros
  • 1
    Small
  • 1
    Fast
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Solr
Solr
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Azure Search, Lucene?

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope