StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Azure Service Bus vs XMPP

Azure Service Bus vs XMPP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Service Bus
Azure Service Bus
Stacks553
Followers536
Votes7
XMPP
XMPP
Stacks70
Followers138
Votes0

Azure Service Bus vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Service Bus and XMPP are two widely used technologies for messaging and real-time communication. While both technologies serve similar purposes, they have some key differences that make them suitable for different use cases. In this article, we will explore and compare the key differences between Azure Service Bus and XMPP.

  1. Message Brokering: Azure Service Bus is a cloud-based messaging service that allows applications and services to communicate with each other through messages. It provides advanced features like pub-sub messaging, durable queues, and topics. On the other hand, XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) is an open-source protocol for real-time communication and messaging. It follows a client-server architecture and supports features like presence management, instant messaging, and group chat.

  2. Protocol: Azure Service Bus uses a proprietary protocol for communication between clients and the service. It offers a REST API as well as client libraries for various programming languages like .NET, Java, and Node.js. On the other hand, XMPP is based on open standards and uses the XML protocol for communication. It provides a well-defined set of XML elements and features for messaging and presence management.

  3. Message Routing: Azure Service Bus provides powerful message routing capabilities, allowing messages to be routed to specific queues or topics based on various criteria like message properties, content, or subscriptions. It also supports advanced features like message ordering and duplicate detection. In contrast, XMPP does not have built-in message routing capabilities. It relies on clients to manage the routing of messages to the intended recipients.

  4. Scalability: Azure Service Bus is designed to scale horizontally, allowing applications to handle large volumes of messages and scale up or down based on demand. It provides features like auto-scaling, partitioning, and load balancing to ensure high availability and performance. XMPP, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for scalable messaging. Although XMPP servers can be deployed in a clustered configuration for high availability, scaling XMPP infrastructure requires careful planning and architecture design.

  5. Security: Azure Service Bus provides robust security features to protect messages and ensure secure communication between clients and the service. It supports authentication and authorization mechanisms like Shared Access Signatures (SAS) and claims-based authentication. It also supports transport-level security using protocols like SSL/TLS. XMPP also supports various authentication mechanisms like SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) and supports encryption using TLS. However, the security features in XMPP are more focused on user-to-server and server-to-server communication rather than client-to-client communication.

  6. Integration: Azure Service Bus provides seamless integration with other Azure services like Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and Event Grid. It also supports integration with on-premises systems through features like virtual network integration and hybrid connections. XMPP, on the other hand, is a standalone protocol and does not have built-in integration capabilities with other services. Integration with XMPP typically involves custom development or the use of third-party libraries and frameworks.

In summary, Azure Service Bus and XMPP are both powerful technologies for messaging and real-time communication. Azure Service Bus offers advanced features, scalability, and seamless integration with other Azure services, making it suitable for cloud-based messaging scenarios. XMPP, on the other hand, is a flexible and extensible protocol that is well-suited for real-time communication, presence management, and instant messaging. The choice between Azure Service Bus and XMPP depends on the specific requirements and use case of the application or system.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Service Bus, XMPP

André
André

Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET Core

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Service Bus
Azure Service Bus
XMPP
XMPP

It is a cloud messaging system for connecting apps and devices across public and private clouds. You can depend on it when you need highly-reliable cloud messaging service between applications and services, even when one or more is offline.

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Statistics
Stacks
553
Stacks
70
Followers
536
Followers
138
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy Integration with .Net
  • 2
    Cloud Native
  • 1
    Use while high messaging need
Cons
  • 1
    Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in
  • 1
    Observability of messages in the queue is lacking
  • 1
    Limited features in Basic tier
  • 1
    Lacking in JMS support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Azure Service Bus, XMPP?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase