Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Service Bus

268
526
+ 1
7
XMPP

66
135
+ 1
0
Add tool

Azure Service Bus vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Service Bus and XMPP are two widely used technologies for messaging and real-time communication. While both technologies serve similar purposes, they have some key differences that make them suitable for different use cases. In this article, we will explore and compare the key differences between Azure Service Bus and XMPP.

  1. Message Brokering: Azure Service Bus is a cloud-based messaging service that allows applications and services to communicate with each other through messages. It provides advanced features like pub-sub messaging, durable queues, and topics. On the other hand, XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) is an open-source protocol for real-time communication and messaging. It follows a client-server architecture and supports features like presence management, instant messaging, and group chat.

  2. Protocol: Azure Service Bus uses a proprietary protocol for communication between clients and the service. It offers a REST API as well as client libraries for various programming languages like .NET, Java, and Node.js. On the other hand, XMPP is based on open standards and uses the XML protocol for communication. It provides a well-defined set of XML elements and features for messaging and presence management.

  3. Message Routing: Azure Service Bus provides powerful message routing capabilities, allowing messages to be routed to specific queues or topics based on various criteria like message properties, content, or subscriptions. It also supports advanced features like message ordering and duplicate detection. In contrast, XMPP does not have built-in message routing capabilities. It relies on clients to manage the routing of messages to the intended recipients.

  4. Scalability: Azure Service Bus is designed to scale horizontally, allowing applications to handle large volumes of messages and scale up or down based on demand. It provides features like auto-scaling, partitioning, and load balancing to ensure high availability and performance. XMPP, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for scalable messaging. Although XMPP servers can be deployed in a clustered configuration for high availability, scaling XMPP infrastructure requires careful planning and architecture design.

  5. Security: Azure Service Bus provides robust security features to protect messages and ensure secure communication between clients and the service. It supports authentication and authorization mechanisms like Shared Access Signatures (SAS) and claims-based authentication. It also supports transport-level security using protocols like SSL/TLS. XMPP also supports various authentication mechanisms like SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) and supports encryption using TLS. However, the security features in XMPP are more focused on user-to-server and server-to-server communication rather than client-to-client communication.

  6. Integration: Azure Service Bus provides seamless integration with other Azure services like Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and Event Grid. It also supports integration with on-premises systems through features like virtual network integration and hybrid connections. XMPP, on the other hand, is a standalone protocol and does not have built-in integration capabilities with other services. Integration with XMPP typically involves custom development or the use of third-party libraries and frameworks.

In summary, Azure Service Bus and XMPP are both powerful technologies for messaging and real-time communication. Azure Service Bus offers advanced features, scalability, and seamless integration with other Azure services, making it suitable for cloud-based messaging scenarios. XMPP, on the other hand, is a flexible and extensible protocol that is well-suited for real-time communication, presence management, and instant messaging. The choice between Azure Service Bus and XMPP depends on the specific requirements and use case of the application or system.

Advice on Azure Service Bus and XMPP
André Almeida
Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor · | 5 upvotes · 413.9K views
Needs advice
on
Azure Service BusAzure Service Bus
and
RabbitMQRabbitMQ

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

See more
Replies (2)

A Pro of Azure Service Bus is reliability and persistence: you can send message when receiver is offline; receiver can read it when it back online. A Cons is costs and message size. You can consider also SignalR

See more
Recommends

There are many different messaging frameworks available for IPC use. It's not really a question of how "new" the technology is, but what you need it to do. Azure Service Bus can be a great service to use, but it can also take a lot of effort to administrate and maintain that can make it costly to use unless you need the more advanced features it offers for routing, sequencing, delivery, etc. I would recommend checking out this link to get a basic idea of different messaging architectures. These only cover Azure services, but there are many other solutions that use similar architectural models.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-grid/compare-messaging-services

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Azure Service Bus
Pros of XMPP
  • 4
    Easy Integration with .Net
  • 2
    Cloud Native
  • 1
    Use while high messaging need
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Azure Service Bus
    Cons of XMPP
    • 1
      Limited features in Basic tier
    • 1
      Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in
    • 1
      Lacking in JMS support
    • 1
      Observability of messages in the queue is lacking
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Azure Service Bus?

      It is a cloud messaging system for connecting apps and devices across public and private clouds. You can depend on it when you need highly-reliable cloud messaging service between applications and services, even when one or more is offline.

      What is XMPP?

      It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Azure Service Bus?
      What companies use XMPP?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Azure Service Bus or XMPP.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Azure Service Bus?
      What tools integrate with XMPP?
      What are some alternatives to Azure Service Bus and XMPP?
      NServiceBus
      Performance, scalability, pub/sub, reliable integration, workflow orchestration, and everything else you could possibly want in a service bus.
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      MSMQ
      This technology enables applications running at different times to communicate across heterogeneous networks and systems that may be temporarily offline. Applications send messages to queues and read messages from queues.
      IBM MQ
      It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.
      See all alternatives