StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure Websites vs Render.com

Azure Websites vs Render.com

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Stacks404
Followers404
Votes23
Render
Render
Stacks276
Followers229
Votes157

Azure Websites vs Render.com: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Websites and Render.com are both cloud hosting platforms that offer the ability to deploy and manage websites. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms that distinguish them from each other. Below are the six main differences between Azure Websites and Render.com.

  1. Pricing and billing: Azure Websites offers various pricing options, including pay-as-you-go and reserved instances, allowing users to choose the most suitable pricing plan for their needs. On the other hand, Render.com follows a simplified pricing model with a flat rate for all resources consumed, making it easier to budget and manage costs.

  2. Deployment options: Azure Websites supports a variety of deployment methods, including Git, FTP, and continuous integration tools like Azure DevOps. Render.com, on the other hand, focuses on a simplified Git-based workflow, making it easy to deploy and manage code changes through Git commits.

  3. Serverless architecture: Azure Websites is built on a traditional server-based architecture where each website is assigned to one or more virtual machines. In contrast, Render.com uses a serverless architecture powered by AWS Lambda, which automatically scales resources based on traffic and eliminates the need to manage and provision servers.

  4. Database integrations: Azure Websites provides native integrations with various Microsoft databases such as SQL Server and Azure Cosmos DB, making it easy to connect and interact with these databases. Render.com, on the other hand, offers support for popular databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and Redis, providing flexibility in choosing the database that best suits the application's needs.

  5. CDN integration: Azure Websites integrates seamlessly with Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN), allowing users to deliver static content with low latency and high availability globally. Render.com does not provide a built-in CDN but offers integration with popular CDN providers like Cloudflare, enabling users to set up their own CDN for content delivery.

  6. Scalability and performance: Azure Websites offers automatic scaling and load balancing options, allowing websites to handle increased traffic and improve performance. Render.com also provides automatic scaling and load balancing features to ensure websites can handle high traffic, with the ability to instantly scale resources up or down based on demand.

In summary, Azure Websites stands out with its diverse pricing options, deeper integration with Microsoft databases, and built-in CDN support. Render.com, on the other hand, focuses on a simplified Git-based workflow, serverless architecture powered by AWS Lambda, and a simplified pricing model, making it an attractive option for developers seeking ease of use and cost predictability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Render
Render

Azure Websites is a fully managed Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that enables you to build, deploy and scale enterprise-grade web Apps in seconds. Focus on your application code, and let Azure take care of the infrastructure to scale and securely run it for you.

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

.NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python;Built-in AutoScale and Load Balancing;High Availability with Auto-Patching;Continuous Deployment with Git, TFS, GitHub;SQL Databases, MySQL, DocumentDB, Search, MongoDB;WordPress, Umbraco, Joomla, Drupal
Instant and continuous deploys from GitHub and GitLab; Global CDN; Fully managed PostgreSQL; Free SSL and custom domains; Static Sites; Private Networking; Disks; Cron jobs; Background workers; Dockerfile support; Infrastructure as Code; Simple, predictable pricing; Amazing support; Native support for Node, Elixir, Go, Ruby, Python, Rust; Reduced complexity; Zero Devops; No servers to manage.
Statistics
Stacks
404
Stacks
276
Followers
404
Followers
229
Votes
23
Votes
157
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Ease of deployment
  • 6
    Free plans for students
Pros
  • 24
    Very easy to start
  • 18
    Pull Request Previews
  • 18
    Easy deployment
  • 18
    Zero Downtime Deploys
  • 18
    Infrastructure as Code
Integrations
No integrations available
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Ruby
Ruby
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
GitHub
GitHub
Rust
Rust
Golang
Golang
Elixir
Elixir
GitLab
GitLab

What are some alternatives to Azure Websites, Render?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase