StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Backendless vs NATS

Backendless vs NATS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backendless
Backendless
Stacks16
Followers74
Votes0
NATS
NATS
Stacks393
Followers498
Votes60

Backendless vs NATS: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment: One key difference between Backendless and NATS is in their deployment options. Backendless is a mobile backend as a service (MBaaS) platform that allows users to easily deploy their app backend in the cloud. On the other hand, NATS is a lightweight messaging system designed for cloud-native applications, often used for inter-service communication within microservices architectures.

  2. Functionality: Another difference lies in the functionality provided by Backendless and NATS. Backendless offers a wide range of features such as user management, real-time database, push notifications, and geolocation services. In contrast, NATS focuses primarily on providing seamless, efficient messaging capabilities to facilitate communication between different components of an application.

  3. Programming Languages: Backendless supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, Java, and Swift, making it versatile for developers with different preferences. In comparison, NATS is programmed in the Go language and offers client libraries for various languages, including Java, Python, and Ruby. This difference in supported languages can influence the choice of developers working on different tech stacks.

  4. Scalability: Backendless is known for its scalability features, allowing applications to easily scale horizontally as the user base grows. Conversely, NATS is highly scalable and lightweight, designed to handle massive message volumes efficiently, making it suitable for applications that require high throughput and low latency messaging.

  5. Community Support: Backendless has a strong community presence with active forums, user groups, and documentation readily available to help developers troubleshoot issues and share best practices. In comparison, NATS also has a growing community, with contributors regularly updating the documentation and providing support through forums and online resources.

  6. Licensing: Backendless offers a freemium model, allowing developers to start with a free plan and upgrade as their needs grow, while NATS follows an open-source licensing model, providing the core messaging system for free with additional enterprise features available for a subscription fee. This difference in licensing models can impact the cost and accessibility of the platforms for developers and organizations.

In Summary, Backendless and NATS differ in deployment options, functionality, supported programming languages, scalability features, community support, and licensing models, catering to different needs and preferences in application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Backendless
Backendless
NATS
NATS

It is a development and runtime platform which simplifies and shortens mobile application development process. The platform removes the need to develop backend functionality by providing reusable server-side services via APIs. The APIs are packaged into native libraries available for all major client-side environments - Andoid, iOS, JavaScript, .NET, ActionScript and REST. The default backend logic can be modified with custom server-side code. The platform is available as an online service and a downloadable Enterprise product which can be deployed in any environment.

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

Provides intuitive APIs for handling user registration, login and session management; Supports object persistence with complex hierarchies; Delivers push notifications to iOS, Android and Windows Phone devices; Handles publish subscribe message routing; Performs ultra fast geo queries; Generates client-side code to get developers to start coding faster; Backend logic can be modified with custom code; Includes in-depth analytics; Allows to export and import data;
-
Statistics
Stacks
16
Stacks
393
Followers
74
Followers
498
Votes
0
Votes
60
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 22
    Fastest pub-sub system out there
  • 16
    Rock solid
  • 12
    Easy to grasp
  • 4
    Light-weight
  • 4
    Easy, Fast, Secure
Cons
  • 2
    Persistence with Jetstream supported
  • 1
    No Persistence
  • 1
    No Order

What are some alternatives to Backendless, NATS?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase