StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. Beats vs Nagios XI

Beats vs Nagios XI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nagios XI
Nagios XI
Stacks36
Followers53
Votes0
Beats
Beats
Stacks165
Followers144
Votes0

Beats vs Nagios XI: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Beats and Nagios XI, it's essential to understand their key differences to choose the right monitoring tool for your specific needs.

1. Scalability:

Beats mainly focus on lightweight data shippers and are generally suited for collecting and sending data to a central location. On the other hand, Nagios XI is a robust monitoring solution that can handle large-scale infrastructure monitoring with ease, offering more scalability options.

2. Monitoring Capabilities:

Nagios XI provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including network, server, and application monitoring, whereas Beats are more specialized in collecting and forwarding data, lacking advanced monitoring features out-of-the-box.

3. Ease of Use:

Beats are designed to be lightweight and easy to deploy, making them ideal for quick data shippers without much configuration overhead. In contrast, Nagios XI requires more initial setup and configuration due to its extensive monitoring capabilities.

4. Customization:

Nagios XI offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the monitoring solution to their specific requirements. Beats, on the other hand, are more limited in customization options and are primarily focused on data shipping tasks.

5. Pricing:

Beats are open-source and free to use, making them a cost-effective choice for basic data shipping tasks. Nagios XI, however, is a commercial solution with licensing fees based on the number of hosts being monitored, which can be a significant factor for budget-conscious organizations.

6. Integration:

Beats are highly compatible with the Elastic Stack, making it easy to integrate with Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana for powerful data visualization and analysis. Nagios XI, while offering some integration options, may require more effort to connect with other tools and platforms.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Beats and Nagios XI can help you make an informed decision based on your monitoring needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nagios XI
Nagios XI
Beats
Beats

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Multi-Tenant Capabilities; Comprehensive IT Infrastructure Monitoring; Proactive Planning & Awareness; Powerful Monitoring Engine; Advanced Graphs; Configuration Wizards; Infrastructure Management; Configuration Snapshot; Advanced User Management
-
Statistics
Stacks
36
Stacks
165
Followers
53
Followers
144
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MariaDB
MariaDB
Linux
Linux
MySQL
MySQL
CentOS
CentOS
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch

What are some alternatives to Nagios XI, Beats?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Wireshark

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

PRTG

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Cisco ISE

Cisco ISE

A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana