StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. BEM vs CSS Modules

BEM vs CSS Modules

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BEM
BEM
Stacks118
Followers98
Votes0
CSS Modules
CSS Modules
Stacks132
Followers161
Votes2

BEM vs CSS Modules: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, there are various approaches to structuring and styling CSS code. Two popular approaches are the Block Element Modifier (BEM) methodology and CSS Modules. This markdown will highlight key differences between BEM and CSS Modules.

  1. Code Organization: BEM focuses on naming conventions to organize code, where each class describes a specific block element or modifier. CSS Modules, on the other hand, uses modularization to encapsulate styles within specific components, providing a more component-based approach.

  2. Namespace Conflicts: BEM uses specific naming conventions that reduce the likelihood of naming conflicts. Each BEM class name is unique and self-contained. CSS Modules generate unique class names for each component, avoiding conflicts by scope, as the styles are locally scoped to the component without the need for long class names.

  3. Dependency Management: BEM usually relies on manual dependency management, where you have to explicitly include all the necessary CSS classes in the HTML markup. CSS Modules, however, automatically handles dependencies by importing and including the required styles in the component file.

  4. Module Reusability: BEM promotes reusability by separating structure and style. Styles can be applied to different elements with the same BEM class, allowing for modular and reusable components. CSS Modules, on the other hand, encapsulate styles within components, often resulting in less reusability as the styles are tighter to the component itself.

  5. Global vs Local Scope: BEM classes have global scope and can be applied to any element within the project. This provides flexibility but can also lead to unintended style conflicts. CSS Modules, on the other hand, have local scope, meaning styles are only applied within the component they are imported into, reducing the chances of style conflicts.

  6. Class Naming Convention: BEM follows a specific class naming convention, where each class represents a block, element, or modifier. This structured naming convention helps developers identify the purpose of each class. CSS Modules do not enforce a specific naming convention, allowing developers more freedom and flexibility in naming classes.

In summary, while BEM focuses on naming conventions and global scope, CSS Modules provide modularization and local scope. BEM promotes reusability through structured class names, while CSS Modules encapsulate styles within components. The choice between BEM and CSS Modules depends on the specific project requirements and the desired approach to code organization and styling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BEM
BEM
CSS Modules
CSS Modules

This methodology was developed at Yandex with the goals in mind that Fast development and long-lasting results for standard projects,A project involves many people,Scalable teams,Code reuse.

It is a CSS file in which all class names and animation names are scoped locally by default. The key words here are scoped locally. With this, your CSS class names become similar to local variables in JavaScript. It goes into the compiler, and CSS comes out the other side.

Statistics
Stacks
118
Stacks
132
Followers
98
Followers
161
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Static rather than compiled at runtime

What are some alternatives to BEM, CSS Modules?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase