Bistri vs Hasura

Overview

Hasura

Stacks343

Followers634

Votes144

GitHub Stars31.8K

Forks2.8K

Bistri

Stacks0

Followers2

Votes0

Bistri vs Hasura: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Bistri and Hasura for website development, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two platforms.

Real-time Communication: Bistri offers real-time video and audio communication features, allowing users to engage in live video calls and conferences directly on the website. On the other hand, Hasura focuses more on real-time data synchronization and APIs for building dynamic web applications without the primary focus on video and audio communication.
Database Integration: Hasura provides seamless integration with databases such as PostgreSQL, allowing developers to access data efficiently for their web applications. In contrast, Bistri does not offer built-in database integration, primarily focusing on real-time communication features rather than database management.
Scalability and Performance: Hasura is known for its scalability and performance optimization, providing tools and features to ensure efficient scaling of web applications as they grow. Bistri, while offering real-time communication capabilities, may face challenges in scaling for larger user bases due to the heavy focus on video and audio processing.
Authentication and Security: Hasura provides robust authentication and security features, ensuring that data transmitted through the platform is secure and protected from unauthorized access. Bistri also prioritizes security but may not offer the same level of authentication and authorization options as Hasura, focusing more on the real-time communication aspects of the platform.
API Flexibility: Hasura offers a flexible API architecture, allowing developers to customize and extend functionalities based on their specific project requirements. Bistri, while providing APIs for integrating real-time communication features, may not offer the same level of flexibility and customization options as Hasura in terms of handling data interactions and web application logic.

In Summary, Bistri and Hasura differ in their offerings related to real-time communication, database integration, scalability, security, and API flexibility in website development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hasura	Bistri
An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.	Text, audio, video chat, web conferencing, screen sharing and more for your websites and business applications. It provides a PaaS of real time communication based on WebRTC for developers, system integrators.
Stack-agnostic; Cloud-agnostic; Git push to deploy; Pre-configured API Gateway; Instant GraphQL or JSON APIs; Out-of-the-box Auth APIs with UI Kits; Filestore APIs with access control; Deploy custom code	Efficient; Secured; Easy to use; Fully integrated within business applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars 31.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 343	Stacks 0
Followers 634	Followers 2
Votes 144	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Fast 18 Easy GraphQL subscriptions 16 Easy setup of relationships and permissions 15 Minimal learning curve 15 Automatically generates your GraphQL schema Cons 3 Cumbersome validations	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes PostgreSQL Docker GraphQL	WordPress JavaScript iOS Android OS

What are some alternatives to Hasura, Bistri?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Bistri vs Hasura: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Bistri and Hasura for website development, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two platforms.

Real-time Communication: Bistri offers real-time video and audio communication features, allowing users to engage in live video calls and conferences directly on the website. On the other hand, Hasura focuses more on real-time data synchronization and APIs for building dynamic web applications without the primary focus on video and audio communication.
Database Integration: Hasura provides seamless integration with databases such as PostgreSQL, allowing developers to access data efficiently for their web applications. In contrast, Bistri does not offer built-in database integration, primarily focusing on real-time communication features rather than database management.
Scalability and Performance: Hasura is known for its scalability and performance optimization, providing tools and features to ensure efficient scaling of web applications as they grow. Bistri, while offering real-time communication capabilities, may face challenges in scaling for larger user bases due to the heavy focus on video and audio processing.
Authentication and Security: Hasura provides robust authentication and security features, ensuring that data transmitted through the platform is secure and protected from unauthorized access. Bistri also prioritizes security but may not offer the same level of authentication and authorization options as Hasura, focusing more on the real-time communication aspects of the platform.
API Flexibility: Hasura offers a flexible API architecture, allowing developers to customize and extend functionalities based on their specific project requirements. Bistri, while providing APIs for integrating real-time communication features, may not offer the same level of flexibility and customization options as Hasura in terms of handling data interactions and web application logic.

In Summary, Bistri and Hasura differ in their offerings related to real-time communication, database integration, scalability, security, and API flexibility in website development.