Overview

Checkstyle

Stacks131

Followers107

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.7K

Forks3.9K

bitHound

Stacks16

Followers21

Votes22

Checkstyle vs bitHound: What are the differences?

Language Support: Checkstyle is written in Java and primarily used for Java development projects, focusing on Java code quality and style checks. In contrast, bitHound supports multiple languages including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and PHP, providing a wider range of language support for code analysis.
Focus on Code Metrics: Checkstyle mainly focuses on code style and formatting issues such as indentation, naming conventions, and code structure. On the other hand, bitHound emphasizes code metrics like complexity, duplications, and dependencies to provide insights into the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase.
Integration with Version Control Systems: Checkstyle integrates with popular version control systems like Git and SVN to automatically analyze code quality during the development process. Meanwhile, bitHound offers integration with GitHub and Bitbucket, enabling developers to receive feedback directly within their code repositories.
Real-time Analysis: Checkstyle performs static code analysis, which means it checks code without executing it. In contrast, bitHound provides real-time feedback on code changes, enabling developers to identify issues as they code and make immediate improvements.
Customizability: Checkstyle allows users to configure custom rule sets to enforce specific coding standards within their projects. In comparison, bitHound offers customizable thresholds for code metrics, allowing teams to set quality benchmarks tailored to their development objectives.
Pricing Model: Checkstyle is an open-source tool available for free, while bitHound follows a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on the size and needs of the development team.

In Summary, Checkstyle focuses on Java code quality and style checks, while bitHound supports multiple languages, emphasizes code metrics, provides real-time analysis, offers customizability, and follows a subscription-based pricing model.

🔥 Trending in Code Review on StackShare

Jira

Code Review

The #1 software development tool used by agile teams to plan, track, and release great software.

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

44

49.5k

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle	bitHound
It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.	With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.
-	Do you know when your third party dependencies are at risk? bitHound gives you insight into the insecure, deprecated, outdated and unused packages impacting your software.; We analyze your code to help your team determine where focus is needed. Understand the mechanical issues impacting your codebase, reduce complexity and clutter, and gain insights that go beyond the command line with bitHound.; Whether it's formal issue management or the team's pending tech debt, it's important to get on top of these issues. bitHound offers an improved understanding of how the team is performing together and whether or not items are being left behind.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 131	Stacks 16
Followers 107	Followers 21
Votes 0	Votes 22
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 Easy setup 5 Zero-config linting integration 5 Automatic dependency analysis 4 Auto sync with Github 3 Excellent customer service
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA Java	GitHub Bitbucket HipChat Slack

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , bitHound?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.