Black Duck vs WhiteSource

Overview

WhiteSource

Stacks25

Followers67

Votes0

Black Duck

Stacks47

Followers122

Votes0

Black Duck vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction

Black Duck and WhiteSource are both software composition analysis (SCA) tools that help developers manage open source components and ensure their security and compliance. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms that distinguish them from each other. Here are six key differences between Black Duck and WhiteSource:

Deployment Methodology: Black Duck is typically deployed as an on-premises solution, requiring users to set up and maintain their own infrastructure. On the other hand, WhiteSource offers both on-premises and cloud-based deployment options, allowing users to choose the approach that best suits their needs.
Scalability and Flexibility: WhiteSource is known for its scalability, allowing organizations to easily manage and analyze large quantities of open source components. It also supports a wide range of programming languages and package managers, offering flexibility for diverse usage scenarios. Black Duck, while also scalable, may have limitations in handling large-scale projects and has a narrower range of supported languages and package managers.
Integration Capabilities: WhiteSource is well-regarded for its extensive integration capabilities with popular DevOps tools and code repositories, making it easy for developers to incorporate security and compliance checks into their existing workflows. Black Duck also provides integration options, but the breadth and depth of its integrations may be more limited compared to WhiteSource.
User Interface and User Experience: WhiteSource places emphasis on providing an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers to navigate and utilize the platform's features. Black Duck, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve and a less streamlined user experience.
Automated Policy Enforcement: WhiteSource includes robust policy management functionality that enables automated enforcement of security policies, license compliance rules, and vulnerability thresholds. Black Duck also offers policy management capabilities but may have less automation and customizability compared to WhiteSource.
Pricing Model: Black Duck typically follows a traditional software licensing model, where users pay for the software based on the number of users or installations. WhiteSource, on the other hand, often utilizes a subscription-based pricing model, allowing organizations to pay based on the number of developers or the size of their codebase.

In summary, Black Duck and WhiteSource differ in their deployment methodology, scalability, integration capabilities, user interface, policy enforcement automation, and pricing models. Choosing between the two would depend on specific needs, such as preferred deployment approach, scalability requirements, integration ecosystem, user experience priorities, level of policy automation, and budget considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on WhiteSource, Black Duck

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

WhiteSource	Black Duck
The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.	It is a solution that helps development teams manage risks that come with the use of open source. It gives you complete visibility into open source management, combining sophisticated, multi-factor open source detection capabilities with the Black Duck KnowledgeBase.
Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;	License management; PDF protection; Trial license; Binary separation; Asset tracking; Audit management; Open source security; Open source compliance.
Statistics
Stacks 25	Stacks 47
Followers 67	Followers 122
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Apache Ant Docker AWS CodeBuild Apache Maven PHP Google Cloud Build .NET Core CocoaPods npm TeamCity	Apache Ant Travis CI Gradle Bitbucket Apache Maven Bamboo Appveyor

What are some alternatives to WhiteSource, Black Duck?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Black Duck vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Methodology: Black Duck is typically deployed as an on-premises solution, requiring users to set up and maintain their own infrastructure. On the other hand, WhiteSource offers both on-premises and cloud-based deployment options, allowing users to choose the approach that best suits their needs.
Scalability and Flexibility: WhiteSource is known for its scalability, allowing organizations to easily manage and analyze large quantities of open source components. It also supports a wide range of programming languages and package managers, offering flexibility for diverse usage scenarios. Black Duck, while also scalable, may have limitations in handling large-scale projects and has a narrower range of supported languages and package managers.
Integration Capabilities: WhiteSource is well-regarded for its extensive integration capabilities with popular DevOps tools and code repositories, making it easy for developers to incorporate security and compliance checks into their existing workflows. Black Duck also provides integration options, but the breadth and depth of its integrations may be more limited compared to WhiteSource.
User Interface and User Experience: WhiteSource places emphasis on providing an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers to navigate and utilize the platform's features. Black Duck, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve and a less streamlined user experience.
Automated Policy Enforcement: WhiteSource includes robust policy management functionality that enables automated enforcement of security policies, license compliance rules, and vulnerability thresholds. Black Duck also offers policy management capabilities but may have less automation and customizability compared to WhiteSource.
Pricing Model: Black Duck typically follows a traditional software licensing model, where users pay for the software based on the number of users or installations. WhiteSource, on the other hand, often utilizes a subscription-based pricing model, allowing organizations to pay based on the number of developers or the size of their codebase.

Black Duck vs WhiteSource

Overview

Black Duck vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?