Blazor vs WebSharper

Overview

WebSharper

Stacks2

Followers5

Votes0

GitHub Stars617

Forks53

Blazor

Stacks549

Followers724

Votes445

Blazor vs WebSharper: What are the differences?

Execution model: Blazor uses a client-side execution model, with the application logic running in the browser using WebAssembly. Meanwhile, WebSharper follows a server-side execution model, where the application logic is executed on the server and the UI updates are sent to the client.
Language: Blazor primarily uses C# and Razor syntax for building web applications, making it easier for developers with .NET experience to transition to web development. On the other hand, WebSharper offers support for F# as the primary language, catering to developers who prefer functional programming for web development.
Community and Ecosystem: Blazor has a larger community and ecosystem due to its integration with ASP.NET and the growing popularity of WebAssembly. WebSharper, while having a dedicated user base, may have a smaller community compared to Blazor, impacting the availability of resources and support.
Integration with JavaScript Libraries: In Blazor, integrating with existing JavaScript libraries can sometimes be challenging due to the differences in execution models between C# and JavaScript. WebSharper, having a longer history in the web development space, may have more seamless integrations with JavaScript libraries.
Tooling and IDE Support: Blazor benefits from robust tooling and IDE support within Visual Studio, enhancing developer productivity and ease of use. While WebSharper also offers tooling support, it may not be as comprehensive as the tools available for Blazor development.
Cost and Licensing: Blazor is free to use as part of the .NET ecosystem, making it a cost-effective choice for developers already invested in Microsoft technologies. WebSharper, however, may require purchasing a license for commercial use, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious development teams.

In Summary, Blazor and WebSharper differ in their execution model, language support, community size, integration with JavaScript libraries, tooling support, and cost considerations for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

WebSharper	Blazor
Develop microservices, client-server web applications, reactive SPAs, and more in C# or F#. Bind composite data models to your reactive user interfaces. The flow of reactive values through the code is explicit yet concise, for maximum readability.	Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.
Functional, reactive applications with WebSharper.UI; Model-View-Update architecture with WebSharper.Mvu; Build React components; Web APIs and server-side JSON and HTML; Use powerful language constructs on the client side	Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
Statistics
GitHub Stars 617	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 53	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 2	Stacks 549
Followers 5	Followers 724
Votes 0	Votes 445
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 63 Uses C# 49 No need to learn separate language or technology 42 Supports making a single page application 40 Tight integration with .NET project 38 Uses .NET standard library Cons 4 Initial load time 2 Hard to inject javascript
Integrations
React C# F#	.NET C# WebAssembly

What are some alternatives to WebSharper, Blazor?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Blazor vs WebSharper: What are the differences?

Execution model: Blazor uses a client-side execution model, with the application logic running in the browser using WebAssembly. Meanwhile, WebSharper follows a server-side execution model, where the application logic is executed on the server and the UI updates are sent to the client.
Language: Blazor primarily uses C# and Razor syntax for building web applications, making it easier for developers with .NET experience to transition to web development. On the other hand, WebSharper offers support for F# as the primary language, catering to developers who prefer functional programming for web development.
Community and Ecosystem: Blazor has a larger community and ecosystem due to its integration with ASP.NET and the growing popularity of WebAssembly. WebSharper, while having a dedicated user base, may have a smaller community compared to Blazor, impacting the availability of resources and support.
Integration with JavaScript Libraries: In Blazor, integrating with existing JavaScript libraries can sometimes be challenging due to the differences in execution models between C# and JavaScript. WebSharper, having a longer history in the web development space, may have more seamless integrations with JavaScript libraries.
Tooling and IDE Support: Blazor benefits from robust tooling and IDE support within Visual Studio, enhancing developer productivity and ease of use. While WebSharper also offers tooling support, it may not be as comprehensive as the tools available for Blazor development.
Cost and Licensing: Blazor is free to use as part of the .NET ecosystem, making it a cost-effective choice for developers already invested in Microsoft technologies. WebSharper, however, may require purchasing a license for commercial use, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious development teams.

In Summary, Blazor and WebSharper differ in their execution model, language support, community size, integration with JavaScript libraries, tooling support, and cost considerations for developers.

Blazor vs WebSharper

Overview