Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sensu vs Blueflood: What are the differences?
Developers describe Sensu as "Open source monitoring framework". A monitoring framework that aims to be simple, malleable, and scalable. Essentially, Sensu takes the results of “check” scripts run across many systems, and if certain conditions are met; passes their information to one or more “handlers”. Checks are used, for example, to determine if a service like Apache is up or down. On the other hand, Blueflood is detailed as "A distributed system designed to ingest and process time series data". It is a high throughput, low latency, multi-tenant distributed metric processing system behind Rackspace Metrics, which is currently used in production by the Rackspace Monitoring team and Rackspace Public Cloud team to store metrics generated by their systems.
Sensu and Blueflood belong to "Monitoring Tools" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Sensu are:
- Execute service checks
- Send notifications
- Collect metrics
On the other hand, Blueflood provides the following key features:
- Ingestion
- Query
- Rollup
Sensu and Blueflood are both open source tools. Sensu with 2.97K GitHub stars and 387 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Blueflood with 591 GitHub stars and 94 GitHub forks.
Pros of Blueflood
Pros of Sensu
- Support for almost anything13
- Easy setup11
- Message routing9
- Devs can code their own checks7
- Ease of use5
- Price4
- Nagios plugin compatibility3
- Easy configuration, scales well and performance is good3
- Written in Go1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Blueflood
Cons of Sensu
- Plugins1
- Written in Go1