StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Bootswatch

Bootstrap vs Bootswatch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Bootswatch
Bootswatch
Stacks119
Followers130
Votes3
GitHub Stars14.7K
Forks3.7K

Bootstrap vs Bootswatch: What are the differences?

Introduction: Bootstrap and Bootswatch are both popular web development frameworks that can be used to create responsive and visually appealing websites. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Version: Bootstrap is a framework that provides a set of predefined CSS classes and JavaScript components, allowing developers to easily create responsive web pages. Bootswatch, on the other hand, is a theme library that provides ready-to-use themes designed for Bootstrap. This means that Bootstrap is the foundation, while Bootswatch builds upon it by offering pre-styled themes.

  2. Customization: Bootstrap offers a wide range of customization options, allowing developers to modify the framework to meet their specific needs. Developers can choose which components to include, customize the color scheme, and adjust various settings. In contrast, Bootswatch provides pre-built themes that are ready to use without requiring much customization. While Bootstrap can be customized extensively, Bootswatch offers a more streamlined approach for those who prefer ready-made themes.

  3. Ease of Use: Bootstrap provides a comprehensive set of documentation and resources, making it easier for developers to understand and implement. It offers a rich collection of CSS classes and components, allowing developers to easily build responsive layouts and add interactive elements. Bootswatch, being a theme library for Bootstrap, simplifies the process even further by offering pre-styled themes that can be easily applied to a Bootstrap project. It provides a straightforward way to achieve a polished and professional look without extensive coding.

  4. Community Support: Both Bootstrap and Bootswatch have a strong and active community of users. Bootstrap, being a widely adopted framework, has a larger community and a vast number of online resources, including tutorials, forums, and plugins. This community support ensures that developers can find help and solutions to common problems. Bootswatch, although a smaller community, also provides support through its website and community forums.

  5. Extensibility: Bootstrap offers a range of JavaScript components, such as carousels, modals, and tooltips, which can be easily integrated into a project. These components provide additional functionality and interactivity to web pages. Bootswatch, being a theme library, does not provide additional JavaScript components beyond what is already available in Bootstrap. However, developers can still utilize Bootstrap's components while using Bootswatch themes.

In Summary, Bootstrap is a web development framework that provides a foundation for building responsive websites, while Bootswatch is a theme library that offers ready-to-use themes for Bootstrap. Bootstrap offers extensive customization options and a wide range of components, while Bootswatch simplifies the process by providing pre-styled themes. Both frameworks have strong community support, but Bootstrap has a larger community and more resources available.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Bootswatch

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Bootswatch
Bootswatch

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Simply download a CSS file and replace the one in Bootstrap. No messing around with hex values.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
14.7K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
119
Followers
13.2K
Followers
130
Votes
7.7K
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 1
    Great customer support
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Very good comunity

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Bootswatch?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase