StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Buefy

Bootstrap vs Buefy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Buefy
Buefy
Stacks98
Followers164
Votes9
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.1K

Bootstrap vs Buefy: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, Bootstrap and Buefy are two popular front-end frameworks that provide a set of pre-designed components and tools to help create responsive and aesthetically pleasing websites. While both frameworks offer similar features, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Grid System: Bootstrap utilizes a flexbox-based grid system, which allows developers to create responsive layouts with ease. It provides a robust grid structure that can be customized and adapted to fit various screen sizes. On the other hand, Buefy does not have its own grid system and relies on the use of CSS grids or other external grid frameworks for creating responsive layouts.

  2. Design Philosophy: Bootstrap follows a more opinionated design philosophy, offering a predefined set of styles and a consistent, cohesive look and feel across its components. It aims to provide a complete solution out of the box, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing websites. In contrast, Buefy takes a more modular approach, offering a wide range of independent components that can be used individually. It provides a more flexible and customizable design, allowing developers to have more control over the visual aspects of their website.

  3. JavaScript Integration: Bootstrap heavily relies on JavaScript for its interactivity and functionality. It includes a set of JavaScript plugins that enhance the behavior of its components, such as dropdowns, modals, and carousels. These plugins require jQuery as a dependency. Buefy, on the other hand, is built on top of Vue.js, a JavaScript framework. It leverages the power of Vue.js components and directives to provide interactive functionality, eliminating the need for external dependencies like jQuery.

  4. Component Library: Bootstrap offers a comprehensive library of components, ranging from navigation bars and forms to modals and carousels. It covers a wide range of UI elements that are commonly used in web development, making it a versatile choice for building websites. Buefy also provides a rich set of components, but the focus is more on the Material Design style. It offers components like buttons, cards, and menus that follow the Material Design guidelines, giving websites a modern and sleek look.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: Bootstrap has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community behind it. It has extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available, making it easy for developers to get started and find solutions to their queries. Buefy, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and documentation compared to Bootstrap. However, it has a growing community and an active developer ecosystem, and its documentation is continuously improving.

  6. Customization and Theming: Bootstrap provides a wide range of customization options and a robust theming system. Developers can easily customize Bootstrap's default styles using CSS variables or by overriding its Sass variables. They can also create custom themes by modifying the core styles. Buefy, on the other hand, offers limited customization options out of the box. It provides a set of default styles that can be overridden using CSS or by creating custom Vue.js components. However, the level of customization is relatively lower compared to Bootstrap.

In Summary, Bootstrap and Buefy are both powerful front-end frameworks that offer a variety of components and tools to help create responsive websites. While Bootstrap provides a more opinionated and complete solution with a robust grid system and extensive documentation, Buefy takes a more modular approach with a focus on Material Design and Vue.js integration. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements, design preferences, and familiarity with the underlying technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Buefy

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Buefy
Buefy

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
98
Followers
13.2K
Followers
164
Votes
7.7K
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 4
    Ease of integration into an existing project
  • 4
    Small and lightweight
  • 1
    Rich components
Cons
  • 2
    Not supported by a well known company
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue.js
Vue.js
Bulma
Bulma

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Buefy?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase