StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Gumby

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Gumby

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Foundation
Foundation
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes740
Gumby
Gumby
Stacks5
Followers14
Votes4
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks429

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Gumby: What are the differences?

Introduction: When it comes to front-end development frameworks, Bootstrap, Foundation, and Gumby are three popular choices among developers. Each of these frameworks has its own unique features, advantages, and disadvantages. Understanding the key differences between Bootstrap, Foundation, and Gumby can help you choose the one that best suits your project needs.

  1. Grid System: Bootstrap uses a 12-column grid system, while Foundation uses a customizable grid system starting from 12 columns. Gumby, on the other hand, uses an 8-column grid system. The grid system defines how the layout of a website is structured, and the number of columns in each grid system can affect the design flexibility and responsiveness of the website.

  2. Customization Options: Bootstrap offers a wide range of pre-designed components and themes, making it easy to quickly create a website with a consistent look and feel. Foundation, on the other hand, provides more customization options and allows for greater flexibility in terms of design. Gumby falls in between, offering some pre-designed components but also allowing for customization.

  3. JavaScript Components: Bootstrap includes a rich set of JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tooltips that can be easily integrated into a website. Foundation also provides JavaScript components but with a different set of features and functionality. Gumby offers a smaller selection of JavaScript components compared to Bootstrap and Foundation.

  4. Community Support: Bootstrap has a large community of developers and contributors, resulting in extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins available. Foundation also has a strong community and support but may not be as extensive as Bootstrap. Gumby, being less popular, may have fewer resources and support available from the community.

  5. Ease of Learning: Bootstrap is known for its ease of use, making it a great choice for beginners or developers looking to quickly build a responsive website. Foundation, while more customizable, may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and options. Gumby is considered to be user-friendly but may require some familiarity with front-end development concepts.

  6. Browser Compatibility: Bootstrap is widely known for its excellent browser compatibility, ensuring that websites built with Bootstrap look consistent across different browsers. Foundation and Gumby also prioritize browser compatibility but may require more testing and adjustments for specific browsers and versions.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Bootstrap, Foundation, and Gumby in terms of grid system, customization options, JavaScript components, community support, ease of learning, and browser compatibility can help you make an informed decision when choosing a front-end development framework for your project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Foundation, Gumby

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Foundation
Foundation
Gumby
Gumby

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Create rapid and logical page layout and app prototypes with a flexible and responsive grid system and UI kit.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Semantic: Everything is semantic. You can have the cleanest markup without sacrificing the utility and speed of Foundation.;Mobile First: You can build for small devices first. Then, as devices get larger and larger, layer in more complexity for a complete responsive design.;Customizable: You can customize your build to include or remove certain elements, as well as define the size of columns, colors, font size and more.;Professional: Millions of designers and developers depend on Foundation. Now we have business support, training and consulting to help grow your product or service.
Syntactically Awesome - Gumby 2 is built with the power of Sass. Sass is a powerful CSS preprocessor which allows us to develop Gumby itself with much more speed — and gives you new tools to quickly customize and build on top of the Gumby Framework.;Brilliantly Flexible - Gumby 2 is an amazing responsive CSS Framework. Websites built today must be mobile friendly in order to survive. Why have two different sites for mobile and desktop when you can have your main site be one size fits all? Gumby Framework is also incredibly customizable; it’s as easy as download, tweak, deploy!;Insanely Simple - Customizing Gumby to fit the needs of your project has never been easier. Changing the entire design of our UI kit is as simple as changing a few Sass variables and assigning the appropriate classes to your markup structure!
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
429
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
5
Followers
13.2K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
14
Votes
7.7K
Votes
740
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 160
    Responsive grid
  • 93
    Mobile first
  • 80
    Open source
  • 75
    Semantic
  • 72
    Customizable
Cons
  • 5
    Requires jQuery
  • 4
    Awful site
Pros
  • 2
    Grid
  • 1
    Small
  • 1
    Responsive

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Foundation, Gumby?

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase