StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Material UI vs Semantic UI

Bootstrap vs Material UI vs Semantic UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445

Bootstrap vs Material UI vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, choosing the right UI framework is crucial for creating visually appealing and responsive websites. Bootstrap, Material UI, and Semantic UI are three popular UI frameworks widely used by developers. In this article, we will explore the key differences between these frameworks to help you make an informed decision for your web development projects.

  1. Responsive Design: Bootstrap is well-known for its responsive grid system, providing developers with a robust foundation for creating adaptable layouts across various devices. Material UI, on the other hand, follows the Material Design guidelines by Google, offering a responsive UI that focuses on smooth animations and transitions. Semantic UI also emphasizes responsive design, but it takes a different approach by utilizing intuitive class names that describe the intended presentation rather than the device type.

  2. Design Philosophy: Bootstrap primarily focuses on making the development process faster by providing pre-designed components and a wide range of customization options. Material UI, as the name suggests, adheres closely to the principles and aesthetics of Google's Material Design language for a visually pleasing and user-friendly interface. Semantic UI prioritizes clarity and intuitive naming conventions to provide developers with easy-to-understand code, making it ideal for rapid prototyping and development.

  3. Component Library: Bootstrap offers an extensive library of ready-to-use components, including navigation bars, forms, buttons, cards, and more. Material UI provides a comprehensive set of UI components following the Material Design specifications, ensuring a cohesive and consistent look for your application. Semantic UI boasts an extensive component library as well, with a focus on intuitive class names that reduce the need for excessive markup.

  4. Ease of Customization: Bootstrap allows for easy customization through its extensive documentation and robust customization options, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced developers. Material UI provides a theming system that allows developers to easily customize the visual aspects of the components, ensuring consistent branding throughout the application. Semantic UI also provides easy theming options and allows developers to customize components using CSS overrides or Inline CSS.

  5. Community Support and Ecosystem: Bootstrap has a large and active community, with a vast number of online resources, documentation, and third-party plugins and themes available. Material UI has gained significant popularity in recent years, resulting in a growing community and a rich ecosystem of plugins and themes specifically catered to Material UI. Semantic UI also has a dedicated community and provides a wide range of additional tools and plugins.

  6. Browser Compatibility: Bootstrap ensures better browser compatibility, as it supports a wide range of browsers, including older versions. Material UI focuses on modern browsers, taking advantage of the latest web technologies. Semantic UI also provides support for popular modern browsers, ensuring a smooth experience for users.

In summary, while Bootstrap focuses on providing a customizable and responsive grid system, Material UI adheres to Google's Material Design principles, and Semantic UI emphasizes intuitive class names and rapid development. Choosing the right UI framework depends on your specific project requirements and development approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Material-UI

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Material-UI
Material-UI

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
992
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
13.2K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
3.7K
Votes
7.7K
Votes
673
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    Extra library needed for date/time pickers
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Material-UI?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase