Bootstrap vs Microsoft Fast Design: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web development, there are various frameworks and design systems available to create visually appealing and functional websites. Two popular options are Bootstrap and Microsoft Fast Design. Although they both have similarities in terms of providing pre-designed components and styles, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. Grid System: One of the primary differences between Bootstrap and Microsoft Fast Design is their grid systems. Bootstrap follows a 12-column grid system, allowing developers to create responsive layouts effortlessly. On the other hand, Microsoft Fast Design utilizes a 4-column grid system, providing a simpler and more streamlined approach to grid-based designs.

2. Component Customization: Bootstrap offers a wide range of customization options. Developers can easily modify colors, typography, and various aspects of the components to match their design requirements. Microsoft Fast Design, on the other hand, has a more limited customization scope. It focuses on maintaining a consistent design language across applications, resulting in less flexibility for individual component customization.

3. Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, Bootstrap is relatively easier to grasp. It has extensive documentation, numerous resources, and a vast community support network, making it beginner-friendly. Microsoft Fast Design, being a relatively newer framework, may have a steeper learning curve with fewer resources available compared to Bootstrap.

4. Compatibility: Bootstrap is compatible with different browsers and devices, including older versions. It ensures consistent rendering and functionality across various platforms. Microsoft Fast Design primarily focuses on modern browsers and devices, emphasizing a more cutting-edge approach to design and technology. This may result in decreased compatibility with older browsers or devices.

5. Integration with other Technologies: Both Bootstrap and Microsoft Fast Design offer integration with other technologies, but they differ in the extent and range of integration options. Bootstrap provides extensive integrations with popular JavaScript frameworks, such as jQuery, Angular, and React. Microsoft Fast Design, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with Microsoft technologies, such as Fluent UI and Microsoft 365 ecosystem, enabling a cohesive experience within the Microsoft ecosystem.

6. Community and Support: Bootstrap has a large and active community, with numerous user-contributed themes, templates, and plugins available. It offers comprehensive documentation and widespread community support. Microsoft Fast Design, as a more specific framework, may have a smaller community and fewer readily available resources. However, being supported by Microsoft, it possesses strong backing and continuous development efforts.

In Summary, Bootstrap provides a versatile grid system, extensive customization options, and a thriving community, while Microsoft Fast Design offers a simplified grid system, consistent design language, and seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem. Choose Bootstrap for flexibility and community support, or opt for Microsoft Fast Design for a more streamlined and Microsoft-centric approach to web development.