StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs mini.css

Bootstrap vs mini.css

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
mini.css
mini.css
Stacks39
Followers57
Votes4
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks202

Bootstrap vs mini.css: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Bootstrap and mini.css are both popular front-end development frameworks used for creating responsive and mobile-first websites. While they have similarities, there are key differences between the two that developers should consider when choosing a framework for their projects.

1. **Grid System**: Bootstrap uses a 12-column grid system, providing a more flexible layout structure compared to mini.css, which uses an 8-column grid system. This difference can impact the way developers design and structure their website layouts.

2. **Customization Options**: Bootstrap offers a wide range of customization options through its extensive list of components and utilities, making it suitable for larger projects with complex requirements. In contrast, mini.css focuses on minimalism and simplicity, providing a more streamlined and lightweight framework for smaller projects or rapid prototyping.

3. **Design Aesthetics**: Bootstrap follows a more traditional design approach, with default styles that are familiar to many users. On the other hand, mini.css features a modern and minimalist design aesthetic, making it ideal for projects that prioritize clean and simple visual elements.

4. **Browser Compatibility**: Bootstrap is known for its broad browser compatibility, ensuring that websites built with the framework display consistently across different browsers. Mini.css, while also offering good browser support, may not have the same level of compatibility as Bootstrap due to its focus on minimalism.

5. **File Size**: Bootstrap has a larger file size due to its comprehensive set of features and components, which can impact website load times, especially on slower connections. In comparison, mini.css is lightweight and optimized for performance, making it a suitable choice for projects where speed is a priority.

6. **Community Support**: Bootstrap has a larger and more established community of developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources for users. Mini.css, while growing in popularity, may have fewer community-driven resources available, potentially making it more challenging for developers to find help and support when needed.

In Summary, Bootstrap and mini.css offer different strengths and considerations for front-end development projects, with Bootstrap providing a robust and feature-rich framework suitable for complex projects, while mini.css offers a lightweight and minimalist approach ideal for simpler projects or rapid prototyping. Developers should evaluate their project requirements and preferences to choose the framework that best aligns with their needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, mini.css

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
mini.css
mini.css

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
202
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
39
Followers
13.2K
Followers
57
Votes
7.7K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 4
    Works great on mobile and loads very fast

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, mini.css?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase