StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Stylus

Bootstrap vs Stylus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Stylus
Stylus
Stacks447
Followers411
Votes331
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks1.1K

Bootstrap vs Stylus: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bootstrap and Stylus are both popular web development frameworks, but they differ in several key aspects. Understanding their differences is essential for developers to choose the most suitable framework for their projects.

  1. Grid System: Bootstrap: Utilizes a 12-column responsive grid system, making it easy to develop responsive web layouts across different devices. Stylus: Does not provide a built-in grid system, requiring developers to build their own or use a separate grid system library.

  2. CSS Preprocessor: Bootstrap: Built with CSS and optionally supports Sass, a popular CSS preprocessor, providing dynamic functionality and reusability. Stylus: A CSS preprocessor that offers a more concise and flexible syntax compared to traditional CSS, making it easier to write and maintain stylesheets.

  3. Component Library: Bootstrap: Comes with a comprehensive set of ready-to-use components, including buttons, forms, navigation bars, and more, allowing developers to quickly build functional web interfaces. Stylus: Does not have a built-in component library, requiring developers to build their own or utilize another component library separately.

  4. Customization Options: Bootstrap: Offers extensive customization options through its documentation and the ability to modify variables, allowing developers to adapt the framework to their specific design requirements. Stylus: Provides greater flexibility for customization due to its nature as a CSS preprocessor, enabling developers to easily create modular and reusable stylesheets tailored to their needs.

  5. File Size and Performance: Bootstrap: Being feature-rich, it has a larger file size and may result in slower page loading times. However, it offers a balance between functionality and ease of use. Stylus: Being a CSS preprocessor, it generates optimized CSS output, resulting in smaller file sizes and potentially faster page loading times.

  6. Learning Curve: Bootstrap: Has a relatively straightforward learning curve due to its extensive documentation, abundant resources, and large community support. Stylus: Requires familiarity with CSS preprocessor concepts and a learning curve to grasp the Stylus-specific syntax and features, but offers more flexibility once mastered.

In summary, Bootstrap provides a ready-to-use grid system, component library, and easier approach for beginners, while Stylus offers a more flexible customization experience, a concise syntax, and optimized file sizes for production. Choosing between them depends on project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Stylus

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stylus
Stylus

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
447
Followers
13.2K
Followers
411
Votes
7.7K
Votes
331
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 69
    Simple
  • 54
    Indented syntax
  • 38
    Efficient
  • 33
    Built for node.js
  • 32
    Open source
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Stylus?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase