StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Toolkit

Bootstrap vs Toolkit

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Toolkit
Toolkit
Stacks31
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks106

Bootstrap vs Toolkit: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, choosing the right front-end framework can greatly impact the efficiency and effectiveness of your project. Bootstrap and Toolkit are two popular frameworks used by developers for building responsive websites. Understanding the key differences between them is crucial for making an informed decision.

  1. Grid System: Bootstrap uses a 12-column grid system, while Toolkit offers a 16-column grid system. This means Toolkit provides more flexibility in terms of layout design and column distribution compared to Bootstrap.

  2. UI Components: Bootstrap comes with a wide range of pre-designed UI components such as buttons, forms, and navigation bars, making it easy to build a responsive website quickly. On the other hand, Toolkit focuses more on providing a lightweight framework with essential components, allowing developers more control over customization.

  3. JavaScript Plugins: Bootstrap offers a variety of ready-to-use JavaScript plugins for common functionalities like carousels, modals, and tooltips, saving developers time and effort in implementing these features. Toolkit, however, relies on third-party plugins and libraries for additional functionalities, giving developers more flexibility but requiring additional effort in integration.

  4. Customization Options: Bootstrap provides a more opinionated approach with predefined styles and components, making it easier for beginners to get started with web development. Toolkit, on the other hand, offers greater customization options and a more minimalistic approach, catering to developers looking for more control over the design and functionality of their websites.

  5. Community Support: Bootstrap has a larger community support with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common issues and explore new features. Toolkit, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community, leading to limited resources and support for developers.

  6. File Size: Bootstrap tends to have a larger file size due to its comprehensive set of features and components, which can impact the loading speed of a website. Toolkit, being a lightweight framework, is designed to have a smaller file size, resulting in faster loading times and better performance for users.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Bootstrap and Toolkit in terms of grid system, UI components, JavaScript plugins, customization options, community support, and file size is essential for choosing the right front-end framework for your project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Toolkit

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Toolkit
Toolkit

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Toolkit makes use of the latest and greatest technology. This includes HTML5 for semantics, CSS3 for animations and styles, Sass for CSS pre-processing, Gulp for task and package management, and powerful new browser APIs for the JavaScript layer.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Mobile First;Responsive Design;Semantic Markup; Flexible Styles;Graceful Degradation;Accelerated Animations
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
106
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
31
Followers
13.2K
Followers
22
Votes
7.7K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
HTML5
HTML5
jQuery
jQuery
Sass
Sass
gulp
gulp

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Toolkit?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase