StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Web Components

Bootstrap vs Web Components

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Web Components
Web Components
Stacks82
Followers60
Votes0

Bootstrap vs Web Components: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Bootstrap and Web Components

Introduction: Bootstrap and Web Components are two popular technologies used in web development. While they both serve the purpose of enhancing the user experience and simplifying the development process, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Coding Language and Framework: Bootstrap is a front-end framework developed using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It provides pre-designed components and styles, allowing developers to quickly build responsive websites. On the other hand, Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that enable the creation of reusable custom elements. They primarily use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to define and manage components.

  2. Browser Support: Bootstrap is designed to be compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions. It includes CSS and JavaScript fallbacks to ensure consistent behavior across various platforms. In contrast, Web Components are relatively new and some features may not be supported in older browsers. However, with the help of polyfills, developers can ensure compatibility with most modern browsers.

  3. Component Scope and Isolation: With Bootstrap, the components are globally scoped, meaning their styles and behavior can affect other elements on the page. In Web Components, each custom element is encapsulated and has its own shadow DOM tree, ensuring that styles and functionality do not interfere with the rest of the page. This provides better code organization and isolation.

  4. Flexibility and Customizability: Bootstrap provides a wide range of pre-designed components and styles that can be easily customized using its extensive set of CSS classes. However, this customization is limited to the options provided by the framework. Web Components, on the other hand, offer great flexibility as developers can create custom elements with their desired styles and behavior. This allows for more advanced customization and design possibilities.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Bootstrap has a large and active community with a vast number of open-source themes, templates, and resources available. It also has extensive documentation and support, making it easier for developers to learn and use. Web Components, being a relatively newer technology, have a smaller community and ecosystem. Although the number of Web Component libraries and resources is growing, it may not match the breadth and depth of Bootstrap's offerings.

  6. Integration and Interoperability: Bootstrap can be easily integrated into existing projects by simply including its CSS and JavaScript files. It can also be used alongside other frameworks and libraries without conflicts. Web Components, on the other hand, require a deeper integration into the application's codebase. They may not be as straightforward to integrate with existing frameworks or libraries, especially those that rely on a different component model.

In summary, Bootstrap is a front-end framework that provides pre-designed components and styles, while Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that enable building reusable custom elements. Bootstrap offers broader browser support and a larger community, while Web Components provide more flexibility and component isolation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Web Components

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Web Components
Web Components

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Web components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
82
Followers
13.2K
Followers
60
Votes
7.7K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Web Components?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase