Bootstrap Vue vs Bulma

Overview

Bulma

Stacks780

Followers855

Votes38

GitHub Stars50.0K

Forks3.9K

Bootstrap Vue

Stacks173

Followers505

Votes43

GitHub Stars14.5K

Forks1.9K

Bootstrap Vue vs Bulma: What are the differences?

Introduction

Both Bootstrap Vue and Bulma are popular CSS frameworks that can be used to quickly build responsive and visually appealing websites. They have several similarities, but key differences set them apart from each other.

Customization Options: Bootstrap Vue offers a wide range of customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the appearance and functionality of their website. It provides a variety of themes, color schemes, and predefined classes that can be customized as per the project requirements. On the other hand, Bulma focuses on simplicity and minimalism, providing a smaller set of predefined styles and classes.
JavaScript Dependencies: Bootstrap Vue heavily relies on JavaScript to provide additional functionality and interactivity. It includes jQuery and Popper.js as default dependencies, which may increase the file size and loading time of the website. In contrast, Bulma is a lightweight framework that does not rely on any JavaScript dependencies, resulting in faster loading times and improved performance.
Grid System: Bootstrap Vue utilizes a powerful grid system that allows developers to easily create complex layouts by dividing the page into rows and columns. The grid system offers more flexibility with its various utility classes, such as offsetting columns and creating responsive layouts. Bulma also provides a grid system, but it follows a more simplified approach with fewer utility classes and options.
Component Library: Bootstrap Vue provides a comprehensive set of UI components, such as buttons, forms, navigation bars, and modals, which can be easily integrated into a website. These components are pre-styled and come with built-in JavaScript functionality for enhanced interactivity. On the other hand, Bulma focuses on providing a clean and minimalistic styling for basic HTML elements and does not include a large collection of predefined components.
Community and Documentation: Bootstrap Vue has a larger community and a more robust documentation compared to Bulma. It has been around for a longer time and is widely adopted by developers worldwide. The extensive documentation of Bootstrap Vue provides detailed explanations and examples for utilizing its features and components, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to their queries. Bulma, although it has a growing community, may have less extensive documentation and fewer resources available.
Ease of Use: Bootstrap Vue, being a more mature framework, offers a smoother learning curve for developers who are already familiar with Bootstrap. It provides consistent naming conventions and a familiar structure, making it easier for developers to transition from Bootstrap. Bulma, on the other hand, has a simpler syntax and a more intuitive class naming system, which may be easier for beginners to grasp.

In summary, Bootstrap Vue provides extensive customization options and a wide range of components, but it comes with larger file sizes and JavaScript dependencies. Bulma, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and lightweightness, with a smaller set of customizable options and a cleaner design. The choice between the two frameworks depends on the specific project requirements and the preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bulma, Bootstrap Vue

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bulma	Bootstrap Vue
Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass	Build responsive, mobile-first projects on the web using Vue.js and the world's most popular front-end CSS library — Bootstrap V4.
-	Responsive; Modular; Accessible; Modern
Statistics
GitHub Stars 50.0K	GitHub Stars 14.5K
GitHub Forks 3.9K	GitHub Forks 1.9K
Stacks 780	Stacks 173
Followers 855	Followers 505
Votes 38	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Easy setup 6 Community-created themes 6 Easy-to-customize the sass build 5 Great docs 5 Responsive Cons 2 Not yet supporting Vue 3	Pros 9 Vue 8 Open Source 4 Maintained 4 ARIA Accessibility out of the box 3 Bootstrap v4.x
Integrations
No integrations available	Vue.js HTML5 CSS 3

What are some alternatives to Bulma, Bootstrap Vue?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap Vue vs Bulma: What are the differences?

Introduction

Customization Options: Bootstrap Vue offers a wide range of customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the appearance and functionality of their website. It provides a variety of themes, color schemes, and predefined classes that can be customized as per the project requirements. On the other hand, Bulma focuses on simplicity and minimalism, providing a smaller set of predefined styles and classes.
JavaScript Dependencies: Bootstrap Vue heavily relies on JavaScript to provide additional functionality and interactivity. It includes jQuery and Popper.js as default dependencies, which may increase the file size and loading time of the website. In contrast, Bulma is a lightweight framework that does not rely on any JavaScript dependencies, resulting in faster loading times and improved performance.
Grid System: Bootstrap Vue utilizes a powerful grid system that allows developers to easily create complex layouts by dividing the page into rows and columns. The grid system offers more flexibility with its various utility classes, such as offsetting columns and creating responsive layouts. Bulma also provides a grid system, but it follows a more simplified approach with fewer utility classes and options.
Component Library: Bootstrap Vue provides a comprehensive set of UI components, such as buttons, forms, navigation bars, and modals, which can be easily integrated into a website. These components are pre-styled and come with built-in JavaScript functionality for enhanced interactivity. On the other hand, Bulma focuses on providing a clean and minimalistic styling for basic HTML elements and does not include a large collection of predefined components.
Community and Documentation: Bootstrap Vue has a larger community and a more robust documentation compared to Bulma. It has been around for a longer time and is widely adopted by developers worldwide. The extensive documentation of Bootstrap Vue provides detailed explanations and examples for utilizing its features and components, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to their queries. Bulma, although it has a growing community, may have less extensive documentation and fewer resources available.
Ease of Use: Bootstrap Vue, being a more mature framework, offers a smoother learning curve for developers who are already familiar with Bootstrap. It provides consistent naming conventions and a familiar structure, making it easier for developers to transition from Bootstrap. Bulma, on the other hand, has a simpler syntax and a more intuitive class naming system, which may be easier for beginners to grasp.

Bootstrap Vue vs Bulma

Overview

Bootstrap Vue vs Bulma: What are the differences?