UIkIt vs Bosonic

Overview

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Bosonic

Stacks1

Followers3

Votes0

GitHub Stars215

Forks19

UIkIt vs Bosonic: What are the differences?

UIkIt: A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces. UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable; Bosonic: A practical collection of everyday Web Components. It is a curated library of reusable Custom elements at an atomic level Carefully crafted with web standards and accessibility in mind, these custom HTML elements cover the web developer everyday needs. Simply put, these are the 'atomic parts' that will make up your application..

UIkIt and Bosonic can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Some of the features offered by UIkIt are:

LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.
Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.
Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.

On the other hand, Bosonic provides the following key features:

A lightweight platform
A future-proof solution
Browser Support

UIkIt and Bosonic are both open source tools. UIkIt with 14.9K GitHub stars and 2.13K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Bosonic with 211 GitHub stars and 22 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Advice on UIkIt, Bosonic

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt	Bosonic
UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.	It is a curated library of reusable Custom elements at an atomic level. Carefully crafted with web standards and accessibility in mind, these custom HTML elements cover the web developer everyday needs. Simply put, these are the 'atomic parts' that will make up your application.
LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.	A lightweight platform; A future-proof solution; Browser Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 18.5K	GitHub Stars 215
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 19
Stacks 791	Stacks 1
Followers 417	Followers 3
Votes 262	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Functional 24 Easy to learn	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub HTML5 Firefox Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Bosonic?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.