StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Brakeman vs PHP CodeSniffer

Brakeman vs PHP CodeSniffer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Brakeman
Brakeman
Stacks164
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.2K
Forks758
PHP CodeSniffer
PHP CodeSniffer
Stacks43
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks1.5K

Brakeman vs PHP CodeSniffer: What are the differences?

  1. Language Support: Brakeman is designed specifically for Ruby on Rails applications, while PHP CodeSniffer is tailored for PHP codebases. Brakeman analyzes Ruby code to identify security vulnerabilities, while PHP CodeSniffer enforces coding standards in PHP scripts.

  2. Focus: Brakeman primarily focuses on security vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and more, helping developers identify potential risks in their Ruby on Rails applications. On the other hand, PHP CodeSniffer concentrates on enforcing coding standards and best practices in PHP code to improve code quality and maintainability.

  3. Deployment: Brakeman can be incorporated into the workflow of a Ruby on Rails project through various integration options such as CI/CD pipelines or IDE plugins. PHP CodeSniffer can also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines but is commonly used as a command-line tool for checking code standards locally.

  4. Customization: PHP CodeSniffer offers a high level of customization through coding standard rulesets and sniffs, allowing developers to define their own coding standards or use existing ones like PSR-1 and PSR-2. Brakeman, on the other hand, has predefined security checks and configurations that may limit the customization options compared to PHP CodeSniffer.

  5. Community Support: Both Brakeman and PHP CodeSniffer have active communities that contribute to the development and improvement of these tools. However, PHP CodeSniffer benefits from a larger user base due to PHP's widespread usage, resulting in more available plugins, rulesets, and support resources compared to Brakeman.

  6. Output: Brakeman provides security reports with detailed information about potential vulnerabilities found in the Ruby on Rails application, including line numbers and severity levels. PHP CodeSniffer generates reports focused on coding standard violations, highlighting areas in the PHP code that need improvement to comply with the specified coding standards.

In Summary, Brakeman is specialized for Ruby on Rails security analysis, while PHP CodeSniffer focuses on enforcing PHP coding standards and best practices. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in improving the security and quality of web applications developed in their respective languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Brakeman
Brakeman
PHP CodeSniffer
PHP CodeSniffer

Free static analysis security tool for Ruby on Rails. Zero-setup security scans for Rails applications based on source code analysis.

It tokenizes PHP, JavaScript and CSS files and detects violations of a defined set of coding standards. It is an essential development tool that ensures your code remains clean and consistent.

-
Code Sniffing; Coding Standard Checking; Coding Standard Fixing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.2K
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Forks
758
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
164
Stacks
43
Followers
31
Followers
43
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Brakeman, PHP CodeSniffer?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana