StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Dependency Monitoring
  5. Brakeman vs Snyk

Brakeman vs Snyk

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20
Brakeman
Brakeman
Stacks164
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.2K
Forks758

Brakeman vs Snyk: What are the differences?

  1. Scope of Vulnerability Detection: Brakeman focuses primarily on detecting security vulnerabilities in Ruby on Rails applications, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and unsafe deserialization. In contrast, Snyk offers a broader range of language support, covering multiple programming languages and frameworks beyond just Ruby on Rails, including JavaScript, Java, Python, and more.

  2. Integration with Development Workflow: Brakeman typically operates as a standalone tool that needs to be run separately from the development process. On the other hand, Snyk offers seamless integrations with popular CI/CD pipelines and Git repositories, allowing for automated vulnerability scanning and remediation within the developer's workflow.

  3. Remediation Guidance: Brakeman provides detailed reports on identified vulnerabilities, but the tool mainly focuses on detection rather than offering extensive guidance on how to fix security issues. In comparison, Snyk not only identifies vulnerabilities but also provides actionable remediation advice, including patches, upgrades, and code snippets to help developers address security weaknesses effectively.

  4. Dependency Analysis: Brakeman primarily analyzes the application code itself for security vulnerabilities and does not delve deeply into the dependencies used within the application. Snyk, on the other hand, specializes in dependency analysis by scanning and monitoring third-party libraries and packages for known vulnerabilities, providing a more comprehensive view of security risks stemming from dependencies.

  5. Community and Support: Brakeman is an open-source tool with an active community of contributors but may have limited support options available. Conversely, Snyk offers both free and paid plans with access to dedicated support channels, including email support, documentation, and community forums, making it easier for users to get assistance when needed.

  6. Real-time Monitoring: Snyk provides real-time monitoring capabilities that actively track vulnerabilities in your projects and dependencies, alerting you to newly discovered issues as they arise. This proactive approach to security monitoring sets Snyk apart from Brakeman, which primarily focuses on static analysis during the development phase.

In Summary, Brakeman and Snyk offer distinct advantages in vulnerability detection, integration, remediation guidance, dependency analysis, support, and real-time monitoring, catering to different needs and preferences in application security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Snyk, Brakeman

Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk
Snyk
Brakeman
Brakeman

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

Free static analysis security tool for Ruby on Rails. Zero-setup security scans for Rails applications based on source code analysis.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
758
Stacks
580
Stacks
164
Followers
380
Followers
31
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
  • 1
    No malware detection
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Snyk, Brakeman?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana