Browserify-CDN vs Docker

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Browserify-CDN

Stacks6

Followers18

Votes0

Browserify-CDN vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Browserify-CDN and Docker, highlighting their key differences in terms of functionality and usage.

Deployment Method: Browserify-CDN is a tool that allows developers to bundle their JavaScript code and dependencies into a single file that can be served directly from a CDN (Content Delivery Network). This method is useful for quickly deploying applications in a simple and browser-compatible manner. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package their applications and dependencies into a container, which can then be deployed on any compatible host environment. Docker provides a more flexible and scalable approach to application deployment.
Dependency Management: Browserify-CDN relies heavily on external JavaScript libraries and dependencies. These dependencies are fetched from CDN servers during runtime, resulting in fast load times and reducing the need for local file storage. In contrast, Docker provides a self-contained environment where all dependencies are bundled within the container itself. This ensures that the application can run consistently across different environments, regardless of the availability of external dependencies.
Isolation and Security: Docker provides a high level of isolation and security by running applications within separate containers. Each container has its own isolated file system, processes, and network stack, preventing any interference between applications. Browserify-CDN, on the other hand, does not provide the same level of isolation. Instead, it relies on the security measures implemented by the CDN service provider.
Resource Footprint: Docker containers are lightweight and consume minimal resources compared to traditional virtual machines. This is achieved by sharing the host's kernel and system libraries between containers. In contrast, Browserify-CDN relies on the client's browser to execute JavaScript code, utilizing the client's resources such as CPU and memory. Thus, Docker provides more efficient resource utilization.
Development Workflow: Browserify-CDN simplifies the development workflow by automatically bundling dependencies and providing a seamless integration with popular build tools. It allows developers to focus on writing code without worrying about complex configuration steps. Docker, on the other hand, requires more setup and configuration. However, it offers benefits such as environment consistency and reproducibility, making it suitable for projects with multiple developers or complex deployment requirements.
Portability: Docker containers are highly portable and can be run on any host system that supports Docker. This makes it easy to deploy applications across different environments, including local development machines, staging servers, and cloud platforms. Browserify-CDN, on the other hand, is limited to browser-based environments and cannot be easily ported to other systems or platforms.

In summary, Browserify-CDN is a convenient tool for quickly deploying JavaScript applications through a CDN, while Docker offers a more flexible and scalable approach to application deployment with features like containerization, isolation, and portability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Browserify-CDN

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Browserify-CDN
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	-
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 6
Followers 143.8K	Followers 18
Votes 3.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, Browserify-CDN?

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Related Comparisons

Browserify-CDN vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Browserify-CDN and Docker, highlighting their key differences in terms of functionality and usage.

Deployment Method: Browserify-CDN is a tool that allows developers to bundle their JavaScript code and dependencies into a single file that can be served directly from a CDN (Content Delivery Network). This method is useful for quickly deploying applications in a simple and browser-compatible manner. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package their applications and dependencies into a container, which can then be deployed on any compatible host environment. Docker provides a more flexible and scalable approach to application deployment.
Dependency Management: Browserify-CDN relies heavily on external JavaScript libraries and dependencies. These dependencies are fetched from CDN servers during runtime, resulting in fast load times and reducing the need for local file storage. In contrast, Docker provides a self-contained environment where all dependencies are bundled within the container itself. This ensures that the application can run consistently across different environments, regardless of the availability of external dependencies.
Isolation and Security: Docker provides a high level of isolation and security by running applications within separate containers. Each container has its own isolated file system, processes, and network stack, preventing any interference between applications. Browserify-CDN, on the other hand, does not provide the same level of isolation. Instead, it relies on the security measures implemented by the CDN service provider.
Resource Footprint: Docker containers are lightweight and consume minimal resources compared to traditional virtual machines. This is achieved by sharing the host's kernel and system libraries between containers. In contrast, Browserify-CDN relies on the client's browser to execute JavaScript code, utilizing the client's resources such as CPU and memory. Thus, Docker provides more efficient resource utilization.
Development Workflow: Browserify-CDN simplifies the development workflow by automatically bundling dependencies and providing a seamless integration with popular build tools. It allows developers to focus on writing code without worrying about complex configuration steps. Docker, on the other hand, requires more setup and configuration. However, it offers benefits such as environment consistency and reproducibility, making it suitable for projects with multiple developers or complex deployment requirements.
Portability: Docker containers are highly portable and can be run on any host system that supports Docker. This makes it easy to deploy applications across different environments, including local development machines, staging servers, and cloud platforms. Browserify-CDN, on the other hand, is limited to browser-based environments and cannot be easily ported to other systems or platforms.

Browserify-CDN vs Docker

Overview