StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Bugzilla vs GitLab

Bugzilla vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Stacks91
Followers126
Votes7

Bugzilla vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Bugzilla and GitLab

1. Integration

GitLab is primarily a code hosting and version control platform, providing a comprehensive set of DevOps functionality. It includes features such as issue tracking, continuous integration, and deployment pipelines in a single integrated platform. Bugzilla, on the other hand, is a dedicated bug tracking system with limited integration capabilities and lacks the built-in code repository management features provided by GitLab.

2. Collaboration

GitLab enables seamless collaboration among developers through features like code review, merge requests, and inline comments on code. This fosters better communication and collaboration in the development process. Bugzilla, on the other hand, primarily focuses on tracking and managing bugs, offering fewer collaboration features. It may require additional tools or platforms to facilitate effective collaboration among team members.

3. Workflow Automation

GitLab provides powerful workflow automation capabilities, allowing teams to define and enforce their development processes through customizable pipelines. This enables automatic testing, code quality checks, and deployment processes, enhancing efficiency and reducing human error. Bugzilla, although it supports basic workflows, does not offer the same level of automation as GitLab.

4. Scalability

GitLab is highly scalable and suitable for both small and large development teams. It can handle a large number of users, repositories, and projects simultaneously. Bugzilla, on the other hand, may face limitations in terms of scalability when dealing with a high volume of bugs or a large number of concurrent users.

5. Git Version Control

GitLab uses Git as its underlying version control system, which is widely adopted and provides advanced branching and merging capabilities. This allows developers to easily manage code changes, collaborate effectively, and track the history of code modifications. Bugzilla does not provide built-in version control support and relies on external version control systems, making it less convenient for developers.

6. Community and Support

GitLab has a large and active community of users, contributors, and documentation resources, providing a wealth of knowledge and support for users. This makes it easier to find solutions to problems and receive assistance when needed. Bugzilla, while still actively maintained, may have a smaller user base and limited community support in comparison.

In summary, GitLab offers a more comprehensive and integrated development platform with features like issue tracking, code hosting, collaboration, workflow automation, and version control, making it suitable for DevOps processes. Bugzilla, on the other hand, focuses primarily on bug tracking and may require additional tools for other development aspects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Bugzilla

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Optimized database structure for increased performance and scalability;Excellent security to protect confidentiality;Advanced query tool that can remember your searches;Integrated email capabilities;Editable user profiles and comprehensive email preferences;Comprehensive permissions system;Proven under fire as Mozilla's bug tracking system;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
91
Followers
54.5K
Followers
126
Votes
2.5K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 2
    Detailed
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Easy to use

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Bugzilla?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jira

Jira

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana