StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Buildbot vs Github Actions

Buildbot vs Github Actions

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buildbot
Buildbot
Stacks73
Followers128
Votes27
GitHub Stars5.4K
Forks1.7K
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Buildbot vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Buildbot and Github Actions

Buildbot and Github Actions are both continuous integration and continuous deployment tools that help automate the process of building, testing, and deploying software. However, they have some key differences that set them apart.

1. **Configuration**: Buildbot uses a Python-based configuration file, which may be more suitable for developers comfortable with Python scripting. In contrast, Github Actions use YAML configuration files, providing a simpler syntax for defining workflows.

2. **Hosted Solution**: Github Actions is a hosted solution provided by Github, seamlessly integrated with Github repositories. On the other hand, Buildbot is self-hosted, requiring users to set up and maintain their own Buildbot server.

3. **Community and Integrations**: Github Actions has a larger user base and community support, with a wide range of pre-built actions available in the Github Marketplace for easy integration into workflows. Buildbot, while flexible, may require users to create more custom integrations.

4. **Scalability and Flexibility**: Github Actions has a limit on concurrent jobs based on the subscription plan, which might impact larger projects. Buildbot, being self-hosted, offers more control over scaling and resource allocation according to project requirements.

5. **Version Control Integration**: Github Actions seamlessly integrates with Github repositories, making it easier to trigger workflows based on events like pull requests, commits, and releases. Buildbot, while offering version control integration, might require more manual configuration for similar functionality.

6. **Platform Support**: Github Actions has broader platform support, including Windows, macOS, and Linux runners. Buildbot, being more configurable, can be adapted to different platforms but may require additional setup and maintenance for non-standard environments.

In Summary, Buildbot and Github Actions differ in terms of configuration style, hosting, community support, scalability, version control integration, and platform support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Buildbot, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Sri Srinivas
Sri Srinivas

Feb 11, 2020

Needs advice

I want to start automatic regressions for nightly builds and also continuous integration builds. The tests I ran are part of my regression suite. And I want to track the results of these tests.

I am able to do this with Jenkins using the Junit plugin. But, I am trying to do the same with Buildbot, and I am not able to get the report of the tests. So, I just want to know is it possible to get the reporting of tests through Buildbot. If yes, could anyone provide some examples

121k views121k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buildbot
Buildbot
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

run builds on a variety of slave platforms;arbitrary build process: handles projects using C, Python, whatever;minimal host requirements: Python and Twisted;slaves can be behind a firewall if they can still do checkout;status delivery through web page, email, IRC, other protocols;track builds in progress, provide estimated completion time;flexible configuration by subclassing generic build process classes;debug tools to force a new build, submit fake Changes, query slave status;released under the GPL
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
73
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
128
Followers
3.1K
Votes
27
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Highly configurable builds
  • 5
    Beautiful waterfall
  • 5
    Hosted internally
  • 4
    Free open source
  • 3
    Python
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Read actions in Marketplace
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Buildbot, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana