Overview

Material Design Lite

Stacks697

Followers394

Votes62

GitHub Stars32.2K

Forks5.0K

Bulma

Stacks780

Followers855

Votes38

GitHub Stars50.0K

Forks3.9K

Bulma vs Material Design Lite: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Grid System: Bulma utilizes a flexible grid system based on a 12-column layout, allowing for easy customization of various screen sizes. In contrast, Material Design Lite uses a 12-column grid system but with a fixed width, providing less flexibility in adjusting the layout based on different screen sizes.
Component Customization: Bulma offers a modular approach to component customization with a wide range of utility classes, making it easier to style elements without the need for extensive CSS coding. On the other hand, Material Design Lite provides pre-designed components following Google's Material Design guidelines, with limited customization options compared to Bulma.
Javascript Components: Material Design Lite comes with a set of ready-to-use JavaScript components like tooltips, sliders, and menus, providing enhanced functionality out-of-the-box. In comparison, Bulma focuses more on CSS-only components, requiring additional JavaScript libraries for advanced interactive features.
Browser Compatibility: Bulma is designed to be more lightweight and compatible with a wider range of browsers, making it a suitable choice for projects that prioritize performance and cross-browser support. Material Design Lite, being a Google-supported framework, may have better compatibility with Google technologies and Chrome browser features.
Responsiveness: Bulma emphasizes responsiveness by default, ensuring that components and layouts adapt well to different screen sizes without the need for extensive media queries. While Material Design Lite also supports responsiveness, its fixed width grid system may require more manual tweaking to achieve optimal layout adjustments.
Community Support: Bulma has a growing community of developers contributing to its development, providing timely updates, new features, and support through forums and documentation. Material Design Lite, being developed and maintained by Google, benefits from the resources and expertise of a major tech company, ensuring stable updates and support for its users.

In Summary, Bulma and Material Design Lite differ in their approach to grid systems, component customization, JavaScript components, browser compatibility, responsiveness, and community support.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Advice on Material Design Lite, Bulma

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material Design Lite	Bulma
Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.	Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass
Blog template;Dashboard template;Text heavy webpage template; Stand alone article template;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 32.2K	GitHub Stars 50.0K
GitHub Forks 5.0K	GitHub Forks 3.9K
Stacks 697	Stacks 780
Followers 394	Followers 855
Votes 62	Votes 38
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Material Design straight from the original creators 11 Based on bem philosophy 9 Nice animations 7 SCSS 5 Simple Material Design	Pros 12 Easy setup 6 Community-created themes 6 Easy-to-customize the sass build 5 Great docs 5 Responsive Cons 2 Not yet supporting Vue 3

What are some alternatives to Material Design Lite, Bulma?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.